Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “United States v. 2318 Markham Court”
Department of Transportation v. Mixonpublic domain
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: October 5, 2021 S20G1410. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. MIXON. PETERSON, Justice. The Georgia Constitution provides that, as a general matter, “private property shall not be taken or damaged for public purposes without just and adequate compensation being first paid.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. I, Sec. III, Par. I (a) (the “Just Compensation Provision”). This Court has long held that this Provisio
Cmty. Success Initiative v. Moorepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 331PA21 Filed 28 April 2023 COMMUNITY SUCCESS INITIATIVE; JUSTICE SERVED NC, INC; WASH AWAY UNEMPLOYMENT; NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; TIMOTHY LOCKLEAR; DRAKARUS JONES; SUSAN MARION; HENRY HARRISON; ASHLEY CAHOON; and SHAKITA NORMAN v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHI
*526APPEL, Justice. This case presents a challenge by landowners to an emergency order issued by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to order the landowners to quarantine land formerly used as a whitetail deer preserve for five years after whitetail deer harvested on the property tested positive for chronic wasting disease, or CWD, The DNR emergency order req
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0328 Filed June 16, 2017 Amended August 22, 2017 TOM BRAKKE and RHONDA BRAKKE d/b/a/ PINE RIDGE HUNTING LODGE, and McBRA, INC., Appellees, vs. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and IOWA NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Dennis J. Stovall, Judge. The Iowa Department
Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombpublic domain
Mr. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion of the Court. The principal question to be decided in this case is whether the employees of a mutual ditch company are exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act1 as persons employed in agriculture. The company is the Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Company, a Colorado corporation having an authorized capital stock
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
*67MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES — PRIVATE PLAINTIFFS and “MINORITY” STATES McGLYNN, District Judge. In Kramer v. Scientific Control Corporation, 534 F.2d 1085 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Kramer, 429 U.S. 830, 97 S.Ct. 90, 50 L.Ed.2d 94 (1976), our Court of Appeals,