Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2286 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Muzammil Ali llllllllll

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3435 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIA MORENO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3435 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIA MORENO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 16-2316 & 16-2467 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASON CORREA and SAUL MELERO, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Abidemi Ajayi deposited a $344,657.84 fraudulent check, which had originally been written to another company, into his bank account. Ajayi spent about half of the money before the bank froze his account. He was indicted and convicted after a jury trial of five counts of bank fraud and one count of money laundering. He now appeals his conviction arguing

TINDER, Circuit Judge. Beginning in August of 2009, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (IMPD) and the FBI conducted a coordinated investigation of a suspected cocaine-distribution organization operating in the Indianapolis area. The two law enforcement agencies employed a variety of investigative techniques, including interviews of confidential informants and suspec

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Alvin Clay appeals the district court’s 1 *1023 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Clay contends that the district court used an incorrect standard to evaluate the effect of

655 F.3d 915 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 25, 2010. Filed August 11, 2011. *916 Steven F. Hubachek and Vincent J. Brunkow, Federal Defenders of Sa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-50170 v.  D.C. No. CR-04-02175-RTB GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the U

674 F.Supp.2d 346 (2009) Courtney R. CARROLL, et al., Plaintiffs v. United States of America, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1670. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 7, 2009. David C. Indiano-Vicle, Seth Erbe, Indiano & Williams, PSC, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Ginette L. Milanes, United States Attorneys Office, District of Puerto

606 F.Supp.2d 897 (2009) Annar้ L. LOUBSER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et at., Defendants. No. 4:04-cv-75-AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division, at Lafayette. March 30, 2009. *899 Annar้ Loubser, Monticello, IN, pro se. Michael J. Stapleton, Cheryl M. Knodle, Elizabeth B. Searle, Bal

264 F.Supp.2d 502 (2003) Alvy T. McQUEEN Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. Defendants. No. H-01-3868. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. Houston Division. March 31, 2003. *506 John A. Townsend, Townsend & Jones, Houston, TX, for plaintiff. Samuel G. Longoria, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for

OPINION BUSH, Judge. Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion for partial dismissal, which has been fully briefed and is ripe for a decision by the court. Because the court concludes that it does not have subject matter jurisdiction over one of the three claims set forth in the complaint, defendant’s motion to dismiss that claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court o

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff David Duncan McCann seeks the release of agency records he requested from Defendant United States Department of Health and Human Services on October 15, 2009, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. Following HHS’s release of more than

697 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2010) MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian tribe, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, et al., Defendants. Case No. 05-23045-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. March 19, 2010. *1327 Dexter Wayne Lehtinen, Felippe Moncarz, Kelly

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOYNER, District Judge. This civil action has been brought before the court on motion of defendant, Beth A. Fiorani to dismiss the plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and plaintiffs cross-motion for leave to file a third amended complaint.1 For the reasons which follow, both motions shall be granted, and the first amended complaint dismissed with le

634 F.Supp.2d 1045 (2007) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.; Sierra Club; and Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; and Jack Troyer, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Intermountain Region, Defendants. No. S-05-02590WBS GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2007.

194 B.R. 94 (1996) Frederick H. QUARLES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellee. Civil A. No. 95-00075-C. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. April 10, 1996. *95 Robert Metcalfe Musselman, Robert M. Musselman & Associates, Charlotesville, VA, for Frederick H. Quarles. United St

OPINION NETTESHEIM, Judge. This case is before the court after argument on plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on liability and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The principal issue for decision is whether plaintiff is entitled to just compensation for a temporary taking under the fifth amendment based on the issuance of a Cease and Desist Order by the U.S. Army Corps of Enginee

401 A.2d 109 (1979) Francis L. MIDDLETON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 9341. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 20, 1976. Decided April 20, 1979. *112 W. Anthony Fitch, Public Defender Service, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Peter E. George, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington,