Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0189p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LIONEL CANNON, AKA Cannon, No. 24-1317 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:19-cv-02337- FLA-SP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 16, 2012 (Doc. 66); (ii) the Defendants’ Motion for Leave of Court to Reply to Plaintiffs’ Reply to Hopkins’ Response to Motion for Summary Judgment, filed September 4, 2012 (Doc. 106) (“Motion for Surreply”); and (iii) the Defe

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: On March 7, 2011, defendant Kamal Abdallah (hereinafter “Abdallah” or “defendant”) was convicted following a jury trial of one count of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1348 and 1349, one count of securities fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1348, and one count of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. On July 1, 2011, de

781 F.Supp.2d 115 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Courtney DUPREE, Thomas Foley, and Rodney Watts, Defendants. No. 10-CR-627 (KAM). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 18, 2011. *120 Michael Lloyd Yaeger, United States Attorneys Office, Brooklyn, NY, for United States of America. Roscoe C. Howard, Andrew

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT The plaintiff, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Ed), and its subsidiaries, brought this claim to recover funds allegedly overpaid to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 1997 tax year, *232when the IRS disallowed certain rental, interest and transaction cost deduction

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Susan Wintermute (Wintermute) appeals her convictions for conspiracy to make a false statement to the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and making a false statement to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, arguing the district court erred by (1) excluding her expert witness’s

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: “When pondering sexy legal issues,” one commentator recently noted, “it is doubtful that tax law crosses the minds of many.”1 Yet, once in a while (alright, a long while), a tax dispute bursts into the mainstream. Take, for example, the legal controversy swirling around the so-called “Son of BOSS” transactions — the quoted phrase being short fo

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-4083 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Susan Wintermute, * *

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge.1 In this Winstar case, the Court must determine the damages due Plaintiff from Congress’s passage of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-73,103 Stat. 183 (1989) (“FIRREA”). The legal theory in these cases is that FIRREA’s restrictions on the inclusion of goodwill in regul

OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. This post-award bid protest was before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiff, University Research Co. (“URC”), requested that the Court enjoin defendant United States (“Government”) from initiating the transition to, and from continuing the performance of, the contract awarded to IQ Solutions, Inc. (“IQS”) under RFP

395 F.Supp.2d 1190 (2005) UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. Slip Op. 05-87, Court No. 02-00116. United States Court of International Trade. July 21, 2005. *1191 Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch,

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. On June 16, 1998, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against “Chucks Emuegbunam a/k/a ‘Chuck,’ ” 1 a citizen of Nigeria who had been arrested in Canada, on one count of conspiring with an individual named Johnnie D. Player and others to

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

747 F.Supp.2d 49 (2010) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC, BY the TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fidelity High Tech Advisor a Fund, LLC, by the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Civil Nos. 05-40151-FDS, 06-40130-FDS, 06-40243-FDS, 06-40244-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

CONTIE, Circuit Judge. Defendants appeal their jury convictions and sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, money laundering, engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, and various substantive offenses involved in the conspiracy. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. I. This case involves the Florida Boys gang, which developed distribut

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT This opinion relates to four consolidated cases filed by the same plaintiff, Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. (Gulf Group), in the United States Court of Federal Claims. 1 The eases arise from four

OPINION PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge: Phillip McLamb raises several challenges to his convictions, following jury trial, on transaction structuring and money laundering charges arising out of two transactions connected with a car dealership he owns. We affirm. I In early July 1990 Harry Godwin contacted a

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This case is similar to more than 120 other cases filed as a result of the impact of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183, on the savings and loan industry. It is one of a handful of lead cases picked for early trial on the issue of damages flowing from what the Supreme Court has characterized i