⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. $9,173.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY”

District Court, D. Delaware · 2017-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 240 F. Supp. 3d 287; 2017 WL 899887; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31986
MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: Presently before the Court is Shawn Baker’s motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND On June 16, 2015, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) seized $614,338.00 from Shawn Baker during a traffic stop.1 (See D.I. 1 at ¶¶ 4—14; D.I. 16-1
District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 841 F. Supp. 2d 1343; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13500; 2012 WL 251911
ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Claimants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. no. 43.) In their motion, Claimants seek dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint or in the alternative pray that summary judgment be granted in their favor.1 To the extent set forth in this Order, Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIE
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-10-18 · Published · cited 18× · 747 F. Supp. 2d 49
747 F.Supp.2d 49 (2010) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC, BY the TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fidelity High Tech Advisor a Fund, LLC, by the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Civil Nos. 05-40151-FDS, 06-40130-FDS, 06-40243-FDS, 06-40244-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-898 (RDM) $9,781,900.00 OF FUNDS IN THE NAME OF FALCON STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an in rem action seeking forfeiture of funds that
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1202T Filed: August 23, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** STEPHANIE L. FLINT AND DAVID J. * JONES, AS EXECUTORS OF THE * ESTATE OF MARGARET J. JONES, * * Plaintiffs, *
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023-04-21 · Published · cited 1× · 66 F.4th 406
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 19-3679 & 19-3774 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STAMATIOS KOUSISIS, a/k/a Tom Kousisis, Appellant in No. 19-3679 UNIT
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
23-6559-cr(L) United States v. Sullivan, Bilda, Rankin UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ___________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: May 13, 2024 Decided: September 6, 2024 Docket Nos. 23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609, 23-7875, 23-7882, 23-7887, 24-91 ____________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-06-29 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LIONEL CANNON, AKA Cannon, No. 24-1317 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:19-cv-02337- FLA-SP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 138 A.3d 102; 2016 WL 1572385; 2016 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 173
OPINION BY Judge RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER. 4 Rafael Falette appeals from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (common pleas) that granted the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's (Commonwealth) petition for forfeiture (Petition) of $34,440 under the Controlled Substances Forfeiture
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-816C Filed: November 30, 2022 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: February 10, 20231 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** KOAM ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC., * * * Protestor,
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017-03-06 · Published · cited 2× · 231 F. Supp. 3d 872; 2017 WL 895748; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31207
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 881 A. The Criminal Charges.. .882 B. The Trials and Convictions... 883 C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884 II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886 A
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-05-24 · Published · cited 19× · 389 F. Supp. 3d 561
HON. JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge Plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this action against surviving family members of Que Te Park to collect a financial penalty assessed against him for failing to report his foreign bank accounts. His children, defendants Charles C. Park, James Park, and Nina Park, have moved *565to
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1230C Filed: February 7, 2021 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: March 18, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * MORTGAGE CONTRACTING * SERVICES, LLC, * *
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013-10-21 · Published · cited 4× · 732 F.3d 1234; 112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6576; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21227; 2013 WL 5684028
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction After a jury trial, appellant Bill Melot was convicted of one count of corruptly endeavoring to impede the administration of the Internal Revenue Code, one count of attempting to evade or defeat tax, six counts of willful failure to file, and seven counts of making false statements to the Department of Agricultur
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013-02-14 · Published · cited 7× · 927 F. Supp. 2d 1120; 2013 WL 684652; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25739
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 16, 2012 (Doc. 66); (ii) the Defendants’ Motion for Leave of Court to Reply to Plaintiffs’ Reply to Hopkins’ Response to Motion for Summary Judgment, filed September 4, 2012 (Doc. 106) (“Motion for Surreply”); and (iii) the Defe
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-03-18 · Published · cited 8× · 781 F. Supp. 2d 115; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28070; 2011 WL 1004824
781 F.Supp.2d 115 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Courtney DUPREE, Thomas Foley, and Rodney Watts, Defendants. No. 10-CR-627 (KAM). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 18, 2011. *120 Michael Lloyd Yaeger, United States Attorneys Office, Brooklyn, NY, for United States of America. Roscoe C. Howard, Andrew
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-03-27 · Published · cited 2× · 936 F. Supp. 2d 468; 2013 WL 1285407; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43788
OPINION WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) brings this civil forfeiture action to forfeit and condemn a total of $263,327.95. This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Claimant Steve N. Chan (“Chan”). There was no oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-04-10 · Published · cited 86× · 564 F.3d 1026; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8657; 2009 WL 961532
564 F.3d 1026 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pavel Ivanovich LAZARENKO, Pavlo Ivanovych Lazarenko, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-10592. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 2008. Filed April 10, 2009. *1029 Dennis P. Riordan (argued), Donald M. Horgan,
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008-07-08 · Published · cited 0× · 568 F. Supp. 2d 791; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90539; 2008 WL 2892812
568 F.Supp.2d 791 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark D. LAY, Defendant. No. 1:07 CR 339. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 8, 2008. *792 Benita Y. Pearson, Antoinette T. Bacon, for Plaintiff or Petitioner. Percy Squire, Richard M. Kerger, for Defendant or Respondent. </