Cases

778 F.Supp.2d 1099 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. $21,055.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, More or less, Defendant. Case No. 08-1273-WEB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 31, 2011. *1101 Colin D. Wood, Office Of United States Attorney, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiff. Scott C. Gyllenborg, Gyllenborg &

Case: 18-10801 Document: 00515187717 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/05/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 18-10801 Fifth Circuit FILED

Case: 18-10801 Document: 00515087912 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10801 FILED August 22, 2019

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. Opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: The United States appeals from the judgment of the district court, Sporkin, J., dis*713missing the government’s civil forfeiture action, brought under 21 U.S.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1202T Filed: August 23, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** STEPHANIE L. FLINT AND DAVID J. * JONES, AS EXECUTORS OF THE * ESTATE OF MARGARET J. JONES, * * Plaintiffs, *

OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. This is an appeal from a civil forfeiture proceeding under chapter 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex.Code CRiM. Proo. Ann. arts. 59.01-. 14 (West 2006 & Supp.2012). In two issues, Charles Eje-kute-Obi, a licensed pharmacist from whom $132,265 was forfeited as proceeds gained from the unlawful dispensing of narcotic

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1131 ___________________________ Alfred Latrell Jackson lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. United States of America

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-518C Filed: June 11, 2022 Reissued for Publication: June 28, 20221 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * THE PORTLAND MINT, * * Plaintiff, *

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 881 A. The Criminal Charges.. .882 B. The Trials and Convictions... 883 C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884 II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886 A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-0798 (PLF) ) ALL ASSETS HELD AT BA

PER CURIAM. Nicholas 1 Krug and a co-defendant, Charles Edward Elliot, together operated a Ponzi scheme. After a jury trial, Krug was convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349. The district court 1 sentenced him t

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellant Jorge Paret-Ruiz (“Paret”) was convicted and imprisoned for nearly four years on drug conspiracy charges that a previous panel of this court concluded were not supported by the evidence produced at his trial. See United States v. Paret-Ruiz, 567 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2009). The charges also led to Paret’s forfeiture of two trucks and a boat. Following

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. In April 2011, law enforcement agents in Maryland seized cocaine that had an estimated street value of more than $13 million dollars. That seizure, as well as other evidence obtained during a joint State and federal investigation, led to a federal indictment of six members of a drug-trafficking organization operating in the Baltimore area (the “Orga

ORDER Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on two motions for Preliminary Orders of Forfei*452ture (“POFs”), (EOF Nos. 593; 793), filed by the United States of America (“the Government”) in the instant criminal action, the Government’s amended motion to hold the forfeiture of substitute assets in abeyan

RESTANI, Judge: Appellants were charged with various crimes arising out of a scheme involving the unauthorized use of personal identifying information to claim fraudulent tax refunds, which were deposited onto debit cards opened in the names of identity theft victims. Appellants Earnest Baldwin (“Earnest”) and Earl Baldwin (“Earl”) were convicted by a jury. Earnest and Earl appeal

Federal Tax Deductions; Foreign Nonresident; 26 U.S.C. § 871; Trade or Business; 26 C.F.R. § 1.183-2; Continuity and Regularity; Expectation of Profit; Gambling; Slot Machines. OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiff, Enrique Free Pacheco, a Mexican citizen and nonresident of the United States, brought suit to recover a tax refund in excess o

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Oscar Bueno and Jose Gonzalez-Zavala belonged to a drug trafficking organization investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”). Both pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 846. Prior to entering his guilty plea, Bueno filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained followi

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge, with whom McKEE, Chief Judge, and BARRY, AMBRO, SMITH, FISHER, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges, join: Defendants John and Timothy Rigas (the “Rigases”) seek to prevent their federal trial in Pennsylvania for conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for substantive tax evasion violations.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This tax refund suit is before the court following a two-day, five-witness trial. The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) determined that the taxpayers understated their income for the 2000 and 2001 tax years. This understatement led to an assessment for underpayment of tax. The IRS attributed the underpayment to fraud and imposed a 75% fr

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1162 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jason Bo-Alan Beckman, also known as Bo Beckman lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 13-1163 __________________________