Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. $27,700.00 in U.S. Currency”
$132,265.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. This is an appeal from a civil forfeiture proceeding under chapter 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex.Code CRiM. Proo. Ann. arts. 59.01-. 14 (West 2006 & Supp.2012). In two issues, Charles Eje-kute-Obi, a licensed pharmacist from whom $132,265 was forfeited as proceeds gained from the unlawful dispensing of narcotic
$24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 0
$24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
247 S.W.3d 739 (2008) $24,156.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-07-00061-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted October 5, 2007. Decided February 7, 2008. Rehearing Overruled March 25, 2008. *740 Donald Rhyne, Forrest City, pro se. Samanth
$24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-07-00061-CV ______________________________ $24,156.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court Franklin County, Texas Trial Court No. 9571 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter a
$130,510.00 in U. S. Lawful Currency v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-07-00132-CV
United States v. $60,020.00 United States Currencypublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER JONATHAN W. FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Preliminary Statement Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), the Government commenced this action in rem for the forfeiture of the sum of $60,020.00 in United States Currency seized from Claimant Joel Luke on January 12, 2008 at the Greater Rochester International Airport. The Court conducted a bench tr
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. The government brought this civil in rem forfeiture action pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) seeking forfeiture of $252,300 in U.S. currency. Section 881(a)(6) authorizes forfeiture of all proceeds traceable to a controlled-substance exchange and all monies used or intended to be used to facilitate such an exchange. Kansas Highway Patrol troopers found the
United States v. Brian Thurmanpublic domain
Ripple, Circuit Judge. Law enforcement executed a search warrant at Brian Thurman's residence after a cooperating informant purchased heroin inside. They discovered drug paraphernalia, two handguns, and a large amount of money. Mr. Thurman was arrested and later charged in a three-count superseding indictment with (1) maintaining a drug-involved premises, in violation of
United States v. Couchpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge When Officers searched the home of Delbert Couch they found marijuana, evidence of marijuana production, a scale, and three coffee' cans which contained $80,120 in cash. Couch’s wallet contained another $954. The Government argues that the cash is subject to criminal forfeiture. Couch ¡objects on two grounds. First, he
United States v. Bradleypublic domain
644 F.3d 1213 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin J. BRADLEY, Jr., Bio-Med Plus, Inc., Albert L. Tellechea, Martin J. Bradley, III., Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin J. Bradley, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin J. Bradley, III., Defendant, Norma Bradley, Interested Party-Appellant. United States of
Corrected In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: October 28, 2022) ********************************** ) Taking via government-induced flooding IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) of private property; post-trial decision on BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) just compensation for six b
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: October 28, 2022) ********************************** ) Taking via government-induced flooding IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) of private property; post-trial decision on BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) just compensation for six bellwether CONTROL RESERVOIRS
Serco Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. This consolidated post-award bid protest ease is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. It involves a government-wide acquisition contract (GWAC)2 awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide technology products and services to the entire Federal government. Sixty-two offerors competed f
Schering-Plough Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
651 F.Supp.2d 219 (2009) SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. Action No. 05-2575 (KSH). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 28, 2009. *221 William J. O'Shaughnessy, Richard Hernandez, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, Charles W. Hall, William S. Lee, Nancy T.
United States v. Martin J. Bradley, Jr.public domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-14934 JUNE 29, 2011 ________________________ JOHN LEY
United States v. Lopez-Medinapublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0321p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERI
United States v. William MacPhersonpublic domain
RAGGI, Circuit Judge. After trial, a jury found William Mac-Pherson guilty of structuring a quarter-million dollars into thirty-two separate cash transactions, each less than $10,000, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(3). Nevertheless, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sterling Johnson, Jr., Judge) set aside the verdict and entered a judgme
Northeast Savings, F.A. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ON DAMAGES WILLIAMS, Judge. This Winstar-related case comes before the Court after a trial on damages. Plaintiff Northeast Savings, F.A. (“Northeast”), seeks three elements of damages: $112,352 million in lost profits, $15,287 million for the cost of raising capital, and “wounded bank damages” comprised of $313,000 in advisory service fees incurred in connection with an abandoned shareholder rights o
United States v. Luis Lopez-Medinapublic domain
OPINION R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Luis Lopez-Medina (“Medina”) appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, as well as his sentence of 292 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release, based upon the district court’s finding that he conspired to distribute 147 kilogram
American Capital Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
FINAL OPINION AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT AWARDING TRANSCA-PITAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION $109.309 MILLION DAMAGES FOR LOSSES BASED ON RELIANCE INTERESTS BRADEN, Judge. This breach of contract ease was filed a decade ago. During the 21 months this ease has been pending before the undersigned judge, the court issued a decision determining, as a matter of law, that the United States (“Government”) was liable for a