Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1703 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cr-00068- v. ART-CLB-1 TRISTON HARRIS STEINMAN, OPINION De

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1703 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cr-00068- ART-CLB-1 v. TRISTON HARRIS STEINMAN, ORDER AND

179 F.3d 265 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Juan Felipe GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Michael Angel Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 97-40854, 97-40855. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 21, 1999. Kathlyn Giannaula Snyde

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The United States of America, on behalf of the Office of Inspector General for the General Services Administration (“OIG”), filed the Petition for Summary Enforcement of two Inspector General (“IG”) Subpoenas Duces Tecum (“Petition”), which is pending before th

551 F.Supp.2d 478 (2008) Edmundo R. STIWARD v. UNITED STATES of America. Civil Action No. 05-1926. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. May 7, 2008. *482 Walter Z. Steinman, Walter Steinman, Attorney at Law, Wyncote, PA, for Edmundo R. Stiward. Matthew J. Glomb, Robert Emmett Kelly, John Seely Luce, Jr., U.S. Depa

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.. .782 BACKGROUND... 782 A.Relevant Statutes.. .783 B. The Alleged Scheme... 784 C. Other Cases and Procedural History. . .786 LEGAL STANDARDS... 787. DISCUSSION.. .788

396 F.Supp.2d 1216 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Albert David HAJDUK, Luxury Wheels O.E. Plating, Inc., Defendants. No. CRIM. 04-CR-346-B. United States District Court, D. Colorado. October 19, 2005. *1217 *1218 *1219

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Albert M. Adargas entered a guilty plea to a charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). In calculating Adargas’s sentence, the district court applied a two-level enhancement pursuant to United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (“USSG”), § 2S1.1(b)(2)(B) (Nov.2002). The court sen

Gormley v Marist Bros. of the Schs., Province of the United States of Am. (2025 NY Slip Op 01612) Gormley v Marist Bros. of the Schs., Province of the United States of Am. 2025 NY Slip Op 01612 Decided on March 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department <

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-542V (to be published) ************************* * Chief Special Master Corcoran * ASHLEY AMERICA, * *

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 23-1631 ________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAPHAEL ROSS, Appellant ________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0094p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plai

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: In No. 99-3071, Scott Lee Feuver, a/k/a Scott Lee Feuer, appeals from the district court’s denial of his Section 2255 motion. The government asserts that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal because Feuver’s notice

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Roderick Tyronda Witherspoon appeals an order of the district court dismissing his motion to vacate his sentence, see 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000)

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Francisco and Veronica Reyes were convicted following a jury trial on one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(D), and one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(D) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The Reye

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ' James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider *1180Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doc. 62] on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 35], filed March 8, 2016 (Doc. 109)(“Motion to Reconsider”). The Court

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 22-1122 __________ HOME DEPOT USA, INC., Appellant v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC. _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Mageno did not object to the alleged prosecutorial misstatements at trial, and did not argue that the statements prejudiced her in her appellate briefs. Mageno’s appeal meets none of our exceptions for consideration of waived arguments. Instead of following our precedent and deeming the argument waived, the majority creates a new exception, considering