Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States of America v. Raji”
FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge. Ronald K. MeMillen and Olanrewaju Raji appeal their sentences imposed on resentenc-ing. In United States v. Edwards, 945 F.2d 1387 (7th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 1590, 118 L.Ed.2d 308 (1992), we held that “the conduct for which a defendant can be sentenced under the Guidelines is limit
United Kingdom v. United Statespublic domain
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Appellants Oladele Raji and Frank Martins appeal the district court’s order declining to compel the disclosure of certain sensitive law enforcement documents possessed by the United States, including grand jury materials, work product, and wiretap information, all of which Appellants contend are relevant to their defense of a criminal prosecution in Engl
United States v. Seefriedpublic domain
Classification/Desc Year Corpus Source or Source Type Excerpt of Concordance Line Contextual summary ription As we said in both Benoit and Ros
United States v. Seefriedpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER SEEFRIED, Case No. 21-cr-287 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Did the electoral certification on January 6, 2021 involve the “administration of justice”? The answer determines whether significant sentencing enh
United States v. Kanodiapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 17-1137 17-1590 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. AMIT KANODIA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]
Raji. v. Bank Sepah-Iranpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Martin Evans, J. The defendants, Bank Sepah-Iran and Bank Sepah-Iran (New York Agency) (hereinafter Bank Sepah), have brought on an order to show cause pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign *1027Immunities Act (28 USC § 1602 et seq.) and CPLR 5240 to vacate restraining notices served by the plaintiffs, Seyed M. Raji and Mar
United States v. Colepublic domain
707 F.Supp. 999 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Marlowe COLE, et al., Defendants. No. 88 CR 1002. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. March 9, 1989. *1000 Anton R. Valukas, U.S. Atty. by Vilija A. Bilaisis, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. Robert A. Korenkiewicz, Chicago, Ill., f
OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Chapter 11 debtor Meruelo Maddux Properties-760 S. Hill Street LLC (“MMP Hill”), one of more than 50 subsidiaries of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc. (“MMPI”), filed a motion seeking a determination that it and other subsidiaries were not subject to the single asset real estate provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §
United Kingdom v. United Statespublic domain
238 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2001) UNITED KINGDOM, requesting the assistance of the United States Government in securing documentary evidence in the case of Regina V. Olumbummi Wood, et. al., Frank Martin, Oladele Raji, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-11114. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. January 19, 2001
United Kingdom v. United Statespublic domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 19 2001
United States v. Raul Gomezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This case involves the disclosure of a federal presentence investigation report (PSI) to state prosecutors. We affirm. BACKGROUND In March 2000, Raul Gomez was federally indicted for conspiracy to commit Medicare Fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering. Gomez pleaded guilty to two counts of the indictment and was
United States v. Srirampublic domain
147 F.Supp.2d 914 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Krishnaswami SRIRAM, M.D., Defendant. No. 00 C 4988. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 12, 2001. *915 AUSA, United States Atttorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Mark S. Hersh, United States Attorney's Office, Chi
334 F.Supp.2d 662 (2004) Hawa Abdi JAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Samson Brown, et al., Plaintiff, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Esmor Correctional Services, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 97-3093(DRD), 98-1282(DRD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey.
United States v. Edwardspublic domain
945 F.2d 1387 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jackie EDWARDS, Leda Martin, Olanrewaju Raji, Andre Stover,Jimmy Lee Coleman, C.C. Hampton, Marlowe Cole,Eric L. Bennett, Reggie Griffin, andRonald McMillen, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 89-2880, 89-2890 to 89-2892, 89-2952, 89-2953, 89-3101,89-3519, 90-1869 and 90-2117. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Ci
United States v. Manu Patelpublic domain
POSNER, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Manu Patel of four counts of violating federal narcotics law in connection with the importation from India of a ton of hashish having a street value of at least $4 million. The judge sentenced him to seventeen years and six months in prison. The appeal raises a number of issues but the only one that merits discussion is whether Patel was s
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Lawrence McCarroll and his associates ■based their drug enterprise in Chicago’s Ida Wells housing complex. Over the thirteen-month period in which the Government monitored their activities, the conspirators bought, diluted, packaged, and sold vast quantities of heroin. A jury convicted all defendants after a lengthy trial, and the district court sentenced t
NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentinapublic domain
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: In these consolidated appeals, we consider the scope of discovery available to a *203 plaintiff in possession of a valid money judgment against a foreign sovereign. Specifically, we review an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Thoma
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.public domain
233 P.3d 1169 (2010) COUNTY OF LA PAZ, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. YAKIMA COMPOST COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation; Yakima Company, Inc., a Washington corporation; Defendants/Counterclaimants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Lincoln General Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 08-0759. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, D
Wiggs v. City of Phoenixpublic domain
4 P.3d 413 (1999) 197 Ariz. 358 Patricia WIGGS, on her own behalf and on behalf of survivors of Shonna Wiggs, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 97-0615. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. September 21, 1999. Revi
In Re Shorts Auto Parts of Warren, Inc.public domain
136 B.R. 30 (1991) In re SHORTS AUTO PARTS OF WARREN, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 90-02728. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York. February 15, 1991. Memorandum-Decision, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order March 13, 1991. *31 Grass, Balanoff & Whitelaw, P.C., Syracuse (Mary Lannon Fangio, of coun