Cases

23-6313(L) United States v. Prawl In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2024 ARGUED: APRIL 7, 2025 DECIDED: AUGUST 18, 2025 Nos. 23-6313(L), 23-6314(CON), 25-400(CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Arlynton Prawl appeals from his conviction on four drug-related offenses in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Elfvin, /.). The district court omitted from the jury charge several instructions requested by Prawl, including: one directing the jury to disregard the guilty plea of a testifying co-defendant (a Mr. Graham) when

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-appellants Winston Hilton, Derrick Irving, Barrington Irving, Solem Joseph, and Carl Coleman appeal from the judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Alvin K. Hellerstein, Lewis A. Kaplan, Judges). Hilton, Barrington Irving, Joseph, and Coleman were convicted after a jury trial of conspiracy to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana in violation of

24-1040 United States v. Runner IN THE United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2024 ARGUED: MARCH 5, 2025 DECIDED: JULY 9, 2025 No. 24-1040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

22‐1799 USA v. Cuomo 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 4 August Term, 2023 5 (Argued: February 12, 2024 Decided: January 3, 2025) 6 Docket No. 22‐1799 7 _________________________________________________________ 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 9

21-1778(L) United States v. Avenatti In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2022 Nos. 21-1778(L), 22-351(CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MICHAEL AVENATTI,

24-2430 United States v. Gunn UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2025 Argued: October 22, 2025 Decided: December 19, 2025 No. 24-2430-cr _____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

24-2975 United States v. Bulloch United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: September 22, 2025 Decided: January 27, 2026 No. 24-2975 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appe

14‐2197‐cr United States v. Vernace UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2015 (Argued: September 18, 2015 Decided: February 2, 2016) Docket No. 14‐2197‐cr

Judge KEARSE dissents in part in a separate opinion. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: We consider here the fate of four partners and employees of Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y”), one of the largest accounting firms in the world, who appeal their convictions in connection with the development and defense of five “tax shelters” that were sold or implemented by E & Y between 1999 and

627 F.3d 41 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose ANDINO, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 09-4694-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 14, 2010. Decided: December 3, 2010. *42 Yuanchung Lee, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Appeals Bureau, New York, NY, for Defendan

506 F.3d 108 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Henk ROMMY, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 06-0520-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: November 28, 2006. Decided: November 5, 2007. *109 *110 Richard D. Willstatter, Green & Willstatter, W

205 F.3d 657 (3rd Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,v.UNIVERSAL REHABILITATION SERVICES (PA), INC., Appellant in No. 97-1412UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,v.ATTILA HORVATH, Appellant in No. 97-1413 Cross-Appellee in No. 97-1467 Not a party to the En Banc ProceedingUNITED STATES OF AMERICAv.RICHARD J. LUKESH, Appellant in No. 97-1414 Nos. 97-1412 and 97-1414 UNITED STA

78 F.Supp.2d 95 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, v. J. Kevin MENEILLY, David Rodriguez and Richard Rodriguez, Defendants. No. 98-CR-371 (DRH). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 21, 1999. *96 *97 Loretta E. Lynch, U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY by Rut

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Derek A. Vaughn and Zaza Leslie Lindo appeal from judgments entered on November 10, 2004, and September 23, 2004, respectively, in the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jones, J.) sentencing Vaughn principally to 97 months’ imprisonment and Lindo to 121 months’ imprisonment for conspiring to distribute at least

*142 POOLER, Circuit Judge: Lung Fong Chen, Joseph Liu, and Schu-man Tu appeal from the January 18, 2002, judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Edward R. Korman, Chief Judge), convicting them after a jury trial of conspiracy to misapply bank

235 Kan. 278 (1984) 680 P.2d 877 DAVID E. JACKSON, et al., Appellees, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, et al., Appellants. No. 55,722 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 6, 1984. Daniel B. Denk, of Kansas City, and Annette Eslick, assistant city attorney, argued the cause, and Robert J. Watson, city attorney, was

OPALA, Justice, with whom LAVENDER, and SIMMS, JJ, join, dissenting. Today the court affirms the judgment on jury verdict in a manufacturer’s products liability action and pronounces that [1] the defendant sufficiently preserved claimed errors for appellate review; [2] the trial court correctly excluded certain midtrial evidence; [3] the trial court’s refusal to give a specially tailored instruction concerning t