Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States of America, ex rel. v. Reliant Rehabilitation Holding, Inc”
ORDER KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendants Lineare Holdings, Inc. and Lineare, Inc. d/b/a Diabetic Experts of America’s motion for summary judgment (Lineare, Inc. is referred to as “Lineare;”1 Lineare Holdings, Inc. is referred to as “Holdings”), on Relators Matt Peoples and Gerry Phalp’s six threshold
[Cite as State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2017-Ohio-2627.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Honda of America Mfg., Inc., : Relator, : v. : No. 15AP-1064 Industrial Commission of Ohio and : (REGU
ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. This case arises out of the refusal of the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”) to recognize the current tribal government of the Winnemucca Indian Colony (the “Colony”) and the interference of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) with the Colony’s activities on its own land. The Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) ordering the BIA to grant interim
OPINION Opinion By Justice O’NEILL. Reliant Hospital Partners, LLC, Nautic Partners, LLC, Michael Brohm, Patrick Ryan, Kenneth McGee, Jerry Huggler, Chad Deardorff, Addison Resolution, LLC f/k/a Reliant Hospital Partners, LLC, Scott Hilinski, James Beakey, Chester Crouch, and Emmett Moore (“appellants”) appeal the temporary injunction issued against them. We reverse and render as to appell
State ex rel. Reichley v. Indus. Comm.public domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Reichley v. Indus. Comm., 2017-Ohio-2939.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. : James R. Reichley, : Relator, : v. No. 16AP-263
United States v. Pegueropublic domain
20-3798 United States v. Peguero United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2021 (Argued: December 7, 2021 Decided: May 13, 2022) No. 20-3798 _____________________________________
19-3591, 19-3595 New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Make the Road New York v. Cuccinelli UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 2, 2020 Decided: August 4, 2020 Docket Nos. 19-3591, 19-3595 STATE OF N
United States v. Basurtopublic domain
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Sentencing Memorandum and *1270Motion for Downward Departure, filed June 18, 2014 (Doc., 57)(“Sentencing Memo.”); (ii) the United States’ Supplemental Briefing to the Court i
Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-382 (Filed: 19 January 2021) *************************************** BILOXI MARSH LANDS * CORPORATION, et al., * * Motion for Summary Judgment; Cross- Plaintiff, * Motion for Summary Judgment; Statute
Rhodes v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. The plaintiff Shilisa Rhodes brought this medical malpractice action against the United States, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671, et seq., for damages allegedly sustained fro
United States v. Cheesemanpublic domain
600 F.3d 270 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. James L. CHEESEMAN, Appellant. No. 09-1756. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued October 27, 2009. Opinion Filed March 2, 2010. *272 Chandra J. Williams (Argued), Charles M. Oberly, III, Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant
United States v. Andujar-Ariaspublic domain
507 F.3d 734 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Falcón Diómedes ANDÚJAR-ARIAS, Defendant, Appellant. No. 06-1189. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 8, 2007. Decided November 19, 2007. *735 *736 Catherine K. Byrne for appellant. Cynthia
Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION........................................................152 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................155 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW................................................156 A. Rule 23 Requirements for Class Certification............................156 <
Dale v. Boy Scouts of America & Monmouth Councilpublic domain
The opinion of the Court was delivered by PORITZ, C.J. In 1991, the New Jersey Legislature amended the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49, to include protections based on “affectional or sexual orientation.” This case requires us to decide whether that law prohibits Boy Scouts of America (BSA) from expelling a member solely because he is an avowed homosexual.
333 F.Supp. 1149 (1971) Dan SULLIVAN, by next friend Daniel H. Sullivan, Michael Fischer, by next friend George David Fischer, et al. v. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. Civ. A. No. 69-H-266. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. June 23, 1971. *1150 *1151 Robe
St. Joseph's Living Center, Inc. v. Town of Windhampublic domain
*697 Opinion ZARELLA, J. The primary issue raised in this appeal is whether the defendant, the town of Windham (town), properly denied the application of the plaintiff, St. Joseph’s Living Center, Inc. (Center), a skilled nursing home facility, for a property tax exemption under General Statutes (
Enhabit, Inc. v. Nautic Partners IX, L.P.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ENHABIT, INC.; ADVANCED ) HOMECARE MANAGEMENT, ) LLC; and ENCOMPASS HEALTH ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0837-LWW ) NAUTIC PARTNERS IX
BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.public domain
WINCHESTER, J., dissenting: ¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. It is important to point out what 23 O.S.2011, § 61.2 does not do: (1) it does not cap damages in cases of wrongful death; (2) it does not cap economic damages for lost wages; (3) it does not cap economic damages for medical expenses; and (4) it does not bar the first $350,000 of non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. With the passage of § 61.2, the Legislature dete
BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.public domain
OSCN Found Document:BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC. BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.2019 OK 28Case Number: 114301Decided: 04/23/2019THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2019 OK 28, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO RE
Abbo-Bradley v. City of Niagara Fallspublic domain
21-0249-cv Abbo-Bradley, et al. v. City of Niagara Falls, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2021 (Argued: May 13, 2022 Decided: July 14, 2023) Docket No. 21-0249-cv JOANN ABBO-BRADLEY, individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of D.B., indi