Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States and Exchange Com v. Ahmed”
United States v. Ahmed Alahmedalabdaloklahpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *
United States v. Ahmed Alahmedalabdaloklahpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SECURITIES No. 24-3830 AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01864-H- Plaintiff - Appellee, DTF v. ONGKARUCK SRIPETCH, OPINION Defendant - Appellant, and AMANDA FLORES, BREHNEN KNIGHT, ANDREW MCALPINE, ASHMIT PATEL, M
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ahmedpublic domain
RULING AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INTUNCTION JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. Plaintiff the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or “SEC”) moves [Doc. #29] for a preliminary injunction continuing the temporary restraining order [Doc. # 241] freezing assets of Defendant and Relief Defendants (“Asset Freeze Order”). On July 23 and 30, 2015, the Court conducted a hearing o
Ahmed v. Noempublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ADIB AHMED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 25-1351 (RBW) KRISTI NOEM, ) in her
United States v. Ahmed Ressampublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washingto
United States v. Ahmed Ressampublic domain
Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United State
15-25-00021-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00021-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/28/2025 8:28 PM No. _____________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________________________
Ahmed v. Oak Management Corp.public domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
United States v. Ahmed Brikapublic domain
OPINION BOGGS, Chief Judge. In Columbus, Ohio, Mohammed Bousf-iha provided Ahmed Brika, his brother-in-law, with a livelihood. He funded his job training and sometimes offered him a place to live when times were tough. After Bousfiha’s marriage to Brika’s sister had ended, Brika organized and executed a plot to kidnap Bousfiha in Morocco and hold him for
United States v. Ahmed Brikapublic domain
OPINION BOGGS, Chief Judge. DefendanU-Appellant Ahmed Brika was tried for conspiracy to commit a kidnapping offense and for using a telephone to extort money in exchange for the release of a kidnapped person. The jury found him guilty of the second offense, but was unable to reach a verdict on the first, as to which the judge declared a mistrial. He was t
Ahmed S. Ismael v. Sheriff Richard Roundtreepublic domain
USCA11 Case: 25-10604 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2025 Page: 1 of 24 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-10604 Non-Argument Calendar __
USCA11 Case: 22-13129 Document: 88-1 Date Filed: 01/16/2026 Page: 1 of 211 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13129 ____________________ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United Statespublic domain
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company (“El-Shifa”) and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris (“Idris”) (collectively “appellants”) brought this suit seeking just compensation for the destruction of a manufacturing facility by the armed forces of the United States. The complaint alleges that destruction of the appellants’ facility constituted a taking
Ahmed v. Keislerpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHAIKH ALI AHMED, Petitioner, No. 04-76246 v. Agency No. A75-516-529 PETER D. KEISLER,* Acting Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.
U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Ahmedpublic domain
Janet Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J. I. Introduction...636 II. Background...637 A. Overarching Facts...637 B. Procedural History...638 C. Defendant's Assertion of his Fifth Amendment Right...638 D. Defendant's Fraudulent Conduct...638 1. Company A ...638 2. Company B ...639
Ahmed Hassan v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1535 A HMED H ASSAN, Petitioner, v. E RIC H. H OLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. No.
Com. v. Baggetta, R.public domain
J-A14003-22 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : RUTH ANNA BAGGETTA :
In re: United States of Americapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att
In re: United States of Americapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 28, 2025 Decided July 11, 2025 No. 25-1009 IN RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition Melissa N. Patterson, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the petition and the reply were Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Att