Cases

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the challenging twenty-nine day trial of Hafiz Muhammad *1292 Sher Ali Khan. A federal grand jury indicted Khan in 2011 on terrorism-related charges. At trial, the Government presented evidence demonstrating Khan’s involvement in the transfer of money

OPINION BASKIR, Judge. In this decision, we address Plaintiffs claim for damages for breach of contract. On February 14, 2001, we entered summary *402judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on liability on Count One of the Complaint, having ruled that the U.S. Forest Service breached a 50-year contract with the Alaska Pulp Corporation (APC) w

Latimer, Judge (dissenting): I dissent. I It is not an easy task to oppose, in an adversarial manner, a court opinion which is written principally to reply to the arguments of a dissenter. Particularly is that true when a number of principles are bandied about without being necessary to the conclusion reached, and without a definite position having been taken. In an effort to

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION William C. Hillman, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the “Plaintiffs Rule 59 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment” (the “Motion for Reconsideration”) filed by the plaintiff Sega Auto Sales, Inc. (the “Plaintiff’) and the “Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Rule 59 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment and Request

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge. The plaintiffs represent a class of Hispanic prisoners who are or who will be incarcerated in District of Columbia correctional institutions. In this suit, they seek injunctive and a declaratory relief for alleged violations of the First, Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d,