Cases

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. *555 The Women's Health Amendment to the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") mandated that women's health insurance include coverage for preventive health care. Through the Amendment, Congress directed the Health Resources and Services Administration ("HRSA"), a component o

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 19-2116 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NAVIENT CORP; NAVIENT SOLUTIONS LLC Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 3-17-cv-01814) Distri

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting : by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania : Department of Environmental : Protection and the Commonwealth of : Pennsylvania Department of : Conservation and Natural Resources, : and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat : Commission, and the Pennsylvania : Game Commission, : Plaintiffs :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge. Plaintiff Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign”) brought this action against Defendants Michael and Constance Sturgis to collect a deficiency allegedly due on several notes after Sovereign foreclosed on the properties securing the debts. The Sturgises responded with an array of fifteen counterclaims alleging various unlawful acts committed by Sove

OPINION Justice SAYLOR. This direct appeal concerns the Commonwealth Court’s jurisdiction over a suit brought by public school employees for injunctive and declaratory relief against the Office of Open Records, seeking to protect the employees’ home addresses from disclosure under the Right to Know Law. I. Background Appellants are individual school employ

427 F.Supp.2d 526 (2006) SOVEREIGN BANK, Plaintiff, v. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., Fifth Third Bankcorp., Defendants. Civ. No. 1:CV-05-1150. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 13, 2006. *527 *528 Joseph Wolfson, Stevens & Lee, P.C., King of Prussia, PA, Stacey A. Scrivan

NEALON, J, The lender’s summary judgment motion in this residential mortgage foreclosure action presents the relatively novel issue of whether a borrower may void and rescind a mortgage agreement *73based upon the predatory lending practices of a lender’s agent in fraudulently generating a grossly inflated property appraisal in order to procure a loan and mortgage

446 F.3d 410 THE DELAWARE NATION, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe, in Its Own Name and as the Successor in Interest to "Moses" Tundy Tetamy, a Former Chief of the Delaware Nation, and of his Descendantsv.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; Edward G. Rendell; County of Northampton, Pennsylvania; J. Michael Dowd; Ron Angle; Michael F. Corriere; Mary Ensslin; Margaret Ferraro; Wayne A. Grube; Ann McHale; Timothy B. Merwarth; Nick R. Sabatine; Co

158 F.Supp.2d 539 (2001) George KOSLOW v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. No. CIV. A. 97-5951. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 31, 2001. Order Vacating Order June 5, 2001. Order Denying Reconsideration July 31, 2001. *540 *541 Thomas

251 F.3d 420 (3rd Cir. 2001) MICHAEL A. WESTON; DEBORAH WESTON, H/W, Appellants,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA d/b/a DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD; DOLORES MERITHEW. No. 99-1608 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Argued September 13, 2000May 22, 2001

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) MID-ATLANTIC EQUITY ) CONSORTIUM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-1407 (PLF)

WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge. *797Table of Contents I. Background...798 A. Contraceptive Mandate...798 B. Regulatory Action to Accommodate Religious Objections...799 C. Hobby Lobby & Wheaton College ...800 D. Regulat

MEMORANDUM Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge The putative class action at bar challenges the confidential treatment regime of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“Department”) colloquially known as the “One Good Eye” policy. Culled to its essence, this administrative policy denies cataract surgery to inmates who retain a threshold modicum of visual acuity in one eye, notwithstanding physician rec

447 F.Supp.2d 415 (2006) COMMON CAUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-2036. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. June 12, 2006. *416 *417 *418 Paul Anthony Rossi,

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, Concurring I join the lead opinion, subject to the proviso that I agree with Justice Wecht’s comments about the relevant analytical framework. In this respect, I also note that sometimes, the mechanical formulation and heralding of a specific test—such as what the Court has dubbed the “Ogontz test”—has unintended consequences. Here, I agree with Justice Wecht, t

916 F.2d 903 12 ITRD 2265, 59 USLW 2292 TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Kappe Associates, Inc., Appellants,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Leroy S. Zimmerman,Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellees. No. 90-5057. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Aug. 10, 1990.Decided Oct. 24, 1990.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0091p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY; STATE OF

885 F.Supp. 694 (1995) Velma CLARK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. No. CA 93-1365. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 4, 1995. *695 *696 *697 *698 *699

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0245p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY; STATE OF TENNESSEE,

MEMORANDUM ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. Plaintiff Crystal Seeney brings suit against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, SCI-Gra-terford (“Commonwealth”), Michael Wen-erowicz, Diana Salkovitz, and Barbara Kalinowsky. Seeney alleges that all of the Defendants violated the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq., and the Family Medical Leave Act (“F