Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United Pacific Insurance Company v. Hunt”
Hunt v. Union Pacific Railroad Companypublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD B. HUNT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N17C-07-069 ALR ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant.
Nicholson v. United Pacific Insurancepublic domain
710 P.2d 1342 (1985) Alan D. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. No. 84-247. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted June 18, 1985. Decided December 17, 1985. *1343 George T. Bennett, John R. Kline argued, Helena, for defendant and appellant. Luxan
Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-111L Filed: January 31, 2022 ________________________________________ ) CHESHIRE HUNT, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-111L Filed: January 31, 2022 ________________________________________ ) CHESHIRE HUNT, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
Batta v. Huntpublic domain
Filed 10/29/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ELI G. BATTA et al., B326589 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. 19VECV01805) THERESE R. HUNT, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior
McKAY, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated appeals, Relator-Appellant Jack Grynberg appeals the district court’s dismissal of a large number of coordinated qui tam cases Relator had brought against numerous natural gas pipelines and other companies involved in measuring natural gas produced from federal or Indian lands.1 The district court dismissed the cases for lack of subject matte
Sands v. Union Pacific Railroad Companypublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RODNEY W. SANDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N17C-06-249 ALR ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, )
American Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 25- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Consol. Ct. No. 20-03914 AMERICAN PACIFIC PLYWOOD, INC., INTERGLOBAL FOREST LLC, and U.S. GLOBAL FOREST, INC., Plaintiffs, and LB WOOD CAMBODIA CO., LTD., and CAMBODIAN HAPPY HOME WOOD PRODUCTS CO, LTD., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES,
North Pacific Insurance v. Stuckypublic domain
JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 The United States District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division, the Honorable Dana L. Christensen presiding, has certified the following questions to this Court: 2. Does Montana law recognize a claim for loss of consortium by the adult child of an injured parent
ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad Companypublic domain
RILEY, Chief Judge. Two companies with a business relationship dating back to the nineteenth century call upon us to resolve their dispute about environmental liability for a lead refinery and smelter — once among the world’s largest — which polluted Omaha, Nebraska, for over a hundred years. The former American Smelting and Refining Company, today known simply as ASARCO, LLC (A
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FARMERS DIRECT PROPERTY No. 23-3320 AND CASUALTY INSURANCE D.C. No. COMPANY, formerly known as 2:21-cv-08807- Metropolitan Direct Property and RGK-JEM Casualty Insurance Company, OPINION Plaintiff - A
OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. Ameriton Properties Incorporated sought a declaratory judgment that it owned a strip of land in western Houston and that Union Pacific Railroad Company’s only interest in that land was a now- *675 abandoned right of way. Union Pacific countercl
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STEPHAN C. MITCHELL, ) ) Supreme Court No.
Jennings v. Hunt Cos.public domain
*67FOR PLAINTIFF WILLIAM H. JENNINGS, II, Eric Robert Stern, Jonathan Scott Sack, SACK & SACK, LLP. FOR DEFENDANTS HUNT COMPANIES, INC. and HUNT FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Alexander Benjamin Spiro, Andrew Peter Marks, Jennifer J. Barrett, Nora Feher, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP. OPINION & ORDER
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 00-512L, 11-775L Filed: February 29, 2016 Reissued for Publication: April 26, 20161 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETRO-HUNT, L.L.C., * * Plaintiff, * v. * Takings; Judicial Taking
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United Statespublic domain
Takings; Judicial Takings Claim; Motion to Dismiss; Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. OPINION HORN, J. The above captioned cases involve the government’s alleged taking in violation of the *370Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution of ninety mineral servitudes underlying roughly 68,000 acres of the Kisatchie National Forest in
Dun v. Transamerica Premier Life Insurance Companypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM DUN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-40 (JEB) TRANSAMERICA PREMIER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In March 2013, Irmadell Dun, a 79-year-old resident of Bozeman, Montana, tripped on the sidewalk, struck her head
Muccio v. Huntpublic domain
Cite as 2014 Ark. 35 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-11-1273 Opinion Delivered January 30,2014 TOM MUCCIO; MIKE MUCCIO; AND APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON NEXT CHAPTER RESOURCES, LLC COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANTS [NO. CV-2010-1040-6] V.
Lowy v. United Pacific Insurancepublic domain
67 Cal.2d 87 (1967) MARCUS LOWY et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants, and Appellants, v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent; ARNOLD WOLPIN, Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Respondent. L. A. No. 28759. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. July 21, 1967. Adelman & Schwartz, Ball, Hunt & Hart, Joseph A. Ball and Joseph D. Mullende
FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MCFADDEN, P.J. and SENIOR APPELLANT JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 4, 2022 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A2