Cases

INTRODUCTION PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. appeals the district court’s dismissal of its due-process claims against the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT). After KDOT removed two Martin Marietta quarries from its preapproved lists of limestone-aggregate suppliers, Martin Marietta unsuccessfully sought pre- and post-deprivation hearings from KDOT. Among its many claims

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A, Lindsay, United States District Judge The court makes the following findings of. fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure following a bench trial on the following claims by Plaintiff Balfour Beatty Rail Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “BBRI”) and Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“Defendant” or “KCSR”) that remain

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GWYNNE E. BIRZER, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Grant M. Nelson’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Directed to Nelson’s Attorney, Michael Kuckelman, or Alternatively, for a Protective Order (ECF No. 44). For the reasons set forth below, Nelson’s motion shall be GRANTED. Background1

ACCEPTED 05-15-00495-CV 05-15-00495-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/17/2015 8:35:00 AM LISA MATZ

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge. This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Kansas City, Missouri School District (“School District”) and against several State boards and entities and several in-tervenor charter schools. The trial court’s Second Amended Memorandum, Order and Judgment entered October 21, 2011 (“Judgment”): (i) awarded the School District a judgment for breach of contract again

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0769 ══════════ Angela Horton and Kevin Houser, Petitioners, v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Distri

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTIONS TO TRANSFER Re: Docket Nos. 281, 283, 285, 286 JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs in this putative class action are former Minor League baseball players who assert claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and California, Florida, Arizona, North Carolina and New Yo

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MODA HEALTH PLAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2017-1994 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:16-cv-00649-TCW, Judge Thomas C. Wheeler. ---

Per Curiam. *740Appellee Moda Health Plan, Inc. and appellants Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company and Maine Community Health Options each filed petitions for rehearing en banc. Appellant Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response to the petitions was invited

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0769 ══════════ Angela Horton and Kevin Houser, Petitioners, v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Distri

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0769 ══════════ Angela Horton and Kevin Houser, Petitioners, v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fif

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge. Plaintiffs appeal from the bankruptcy court’s decision to grant Defendant summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ adversary action requesting equitable subordination of Defendant’s secured interest in the debt- or’s assets. The Bankruptcy Code gives courts the discretion to equitably subordinate creditors’ claims if the creditor engaged in inequitable conduct tha

12 F.Supp.2d 1157 (1998) DEVORE & SONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THOMAS NELSON, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-1425-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 19, 1998. *1158 Charles E. Millsap, Gregory J. Stucky, Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, L.L.C., Wichita, KS, for plaintiff. Carol A. Beier, Foulston

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs assert a cause of action for equitable subordination against defendant Seacoast Capital Partners II, L.P. (“Seacoast”) seeking to subordinate defendant’s priority from a secured creditor of debtor QuVis, Inc. (“QuVis”) to an unsecured creditor.1 Plaintiffs allege that Se

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge: Plaintiffs TAGC Management, LLC, TAGC I, LLC, and Total Access Global Capital, LLC are a group of companies that attempted to start a credit card business in China. Defendants are a law firm as well as business entities and individuals related to the firm, all located in China, that plaintiffs had retained for legal and other prof

271 Kan. 1 (2001) 20 P.3d 39 DAVID PRAGER, III, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; KARLA PIERCE, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Revenue, In Her Official Capacity; and JOHN D. LAFAVER, former Secretary of Kansas Department of Revenue, In His Personal Capacity, Defendants/Appellees. No. 83,714. Supreme Court of Kansas. O

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

OPINION AND ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, District Judge: BMR & Associates, LLP, and BMR Ad-visors (collectively, “BMR” or “Plaintiffs”), initiated this action against SFW Capital Partners, LLC (“SFW” or “Defendant”) for various breach of contract and other related claims based on SFWs alleged non-payment for work undertaken by BMR relating to a potential investment by SFW in a group of Indian companies. Bef

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ