Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 14, 2020 Decided November 3, 2020 No. 19-1164 COMPTEL, D/B/A INCOMPAS, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , RESPONDENTS USTELECOM, THE BROADBAND A SSOCIATION, INTERVENOR Consol

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0224p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION (24-3133); TEXAS │ ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS (24-3206); CTI

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 17, 2020 Decided March 13, 2020 No. 19-1085 IRREGULATORS, ET AL., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Communications Commission

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2296 ___________________________ Citizens Telecommunications Company of Minnesota, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllResponden

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 1, 2021 Decided May 27, 2022 No. 20-1471 INTELIQUENT, INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1179 ___________________________ Minnesota Telecom Alliance lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0211p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION (24-3133); TEXAS │ ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS (24-3206);

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0230p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA, et al.,

Briefs were filed by the following parties: CENTURYLINK, INC. and CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, LLC., Russell P. Hanser, Brian W. Murray, Ethan D. Jeans and Melissa L. Turcios of Washington, DC GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC; BT AMERICAS, INC.; and INCOMPAS, Markham Cho Erickson, Washington DC WINDSTREAM SERVICES, LLC and SPRINT CORPORATION, Christopher J. Wright, John T. Nakahata, Timothy J. Simeone, H

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2290 ___________________________ Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC; Charter Advanced Services VIII (MN), LLC Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Nancy Lange, in her official capacity as Chair of the Minnesota Public

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge In spring of 2017, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") promulgated a proposed rule to establish regulations for broadband internet service providers. Captioned "Restoring Internet Freedom," the rulemaking sought to repeal prior regulations promoting "net neutrality"-the principle that internet service providers afford equal access to all internet-enabled d

529 F.3d 763 (2008) ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA, et al., Petitioners, State of Hawaii; City and County of San Francisco; National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Inc.; City of New York; City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin; City of White Plains, New York; City of Wilmington, Delaware, Intervenors, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America, Respondents, Ad Hoc Telecom Manufacturer Coalition; Qwest Communications I

Pillard, Circuit Judge: The Federal Communications Commission has, since the agency's inception, been charged to ensure that everyone in the United States has access to critical telecommunications services. This mandate is effected through a system of federal subsidies to certain designated carriers that are required to offer essential services to underserved consumers. Recognizing the

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge: Petitioners Verizon and AT & T appeal the FCC’s denial of their petition to forbear from applying the requirement that incumbent price cap carriers maintain a Uniform System of Accounts. The Commission insists that the statutory preconditions for section 10 f

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with much of the majority opinion but am constrained to dissent. In my view the Commission’s Order must be vacated for three reasons: I. The Commission’s justification of its switch in classification of broadband from a Title I inf

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 140–167 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 21, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON PRECHTEL Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-01835 (CRC) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In spring of 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) promulgated

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ACA CONNECTS – AMERICA’S No. 21-15430 COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, FKA American Cable Association; D.C. No. CTIA – THE WIRELESS 2:18-cv-02684- ASSOCIATION; NCTA – THE JAM-DB INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION; USTELECOM – THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

USCA11 Case: 19-15072 Date Filed: 10/26/2021 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-15072 ____________________ AUTAUGA COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION DISTRICT, CALHOUN COUNTY 911 DISTRICT, BIRMINGHAM EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT,

21-1975-cv New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. James United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: January 12, 2023 Decided: April 26, 2024 No. 21-1975 NEW YORK STATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC., CTIA - THE WIRELESS