Cases

150 F.Supp.2d 7 (2001) Edward G. TINSLEY, Plaintiff, v. Honorable H. Emory WIDENER, Jr. et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 000157(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 19, 2001. *8 Edward G. Tinsley, Washington, DC, for plaintiff Tinsley. Eric M. Jaffe, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Same case below, 304 Fed. Appx. 29.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 15-P-1743 Appeals Court COMMONWEALTH

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Del. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until November 23, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Stevens would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

[Cite as State v. Widener, 2014-Ohio-333.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 2013 CA 29 v. : T.C. NO. 20940003 CHAD WIDENER : (Civil appeal from Common

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 28, 2011 Session JOHN AMBLER WIDENER v. STEPHANIE ELIZABETH WIDENER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08D-2061 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2010-02435-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 12, 2011 Defendant Mother appeals the trial court’s judgment naming Plaintiff

*475LOCKEMY, J. I respectfully dissent. While I do not dispute the law cited by the majority that the right to a setoff automatically applies where the proceeds are for the same injury, I agree with the conclusion of the trial court that no portion of the settlement paid by CitiStreet accounted for the $35,410.38 actual damage claim submitted to the jury against Widener

675 S.E.2d 591 (2009) COWART et al. v. WIDENER et al. United Transportation, Inc. v. Cowart et al. Nos. A09A0718, A09A0719. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 18, 2009. Amy R. Snell, John Arthur Davison, Fulcher & Hagler, Augusta, for United Transportation, Inc. Charles C. Stebbins, III, Warlick, Tritt, Stebbins & Murray, Augusta, for Cowa

Sup. Ct. Del. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until November 23, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Stevens would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Sup. Ct. Del. Motion of petitioner for reconsidera*1019tion of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 951] denied.

Sup. Ct. Del. Motion of petitioner for reconsidera*1019tion of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 951] denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, District Judge. Presently before this Court is Defendant Widener University’ (‘Widener” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. 3) and Plaintiff Jeffrey North’ (“Plaintiff” or “North”) Response in opposition thereto (Doc. 6.) This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, and 1367(a). Venue is proper

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J. Paul Kelley Jr. (“Paul”),1 and Connie Kelley (“Connie”),2 Trustees of the Paul Kelley, Jr. and Connie Kelley Joint Revocable Trust dated November 16, 2006 (the “Trust”), appeal from a judgment, after a bench trial, awarding them damages for the cost to repair garage doors. The Kel-leys assert two points of trial court error. We affirm the jud

HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I respectfully dissent to the majority’s affirmance of the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees. The majority fails to apply the proper standard of review to summary judgment cases and improperly construes the evidence in favor of appellees, the respondents. I would reverse because a de novo review of

*302 OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal of a denial of class certification in a suit alleging that Widener University School of Law defrauded a putative class of law students by publishing misleading statistics about its graduates’ employment, which ca

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.