Cases

*57MEMORANDUM ** David Gonzalez-Tadeo appeals his 37-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to unlawful re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Gonzalez-Tadeo contends that his prior conviction under Idaho’s statute for battery with intent to commit a serious

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Juan Manuel Tadeo (“Tadeo”) appeals from the 21-month sentence imposed by the district court following the revocation of his supervised release. Tadeo contends that the district court abused its discretion in departing upward from the policy statement range of 8 to 14 months for a Grade C violation of a condition of supervised release, and failing to- consi

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstRafael Tadeo-Peralta, Appellant. Appellate Advocates (Laura B. Indellicati of counsel), for appellant. Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Raja Rajeswari

MEMORANDUM ** Benjamin Tadeo-Hernandez and Ruth Noemi Gastelum-Tadeo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decisions adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to entertain this petition for review because the Board’s discretionary determination th

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-19-00376-CR IN RE STATE OF TEXAS, ex. rel. Todd “Tadeo” Durden, County Attorney Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Opinion by: Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

939 P.2d 220 (1997) 86 Wash.App. 813 The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Leonel TADEO-MARES, Appellant. No. 14618-9-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine. July 1, 1997. Reconsideration Denied July 25, 1997. *221 Philip E. Nino, Spokane, for Appellant. John

*518MEMORANDUM ** Darlene Meraz appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of probation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Meraz contends that the district court failed to consider the Sentencing Commission’s Chapter 7 policy statements because the district court made no reference t

*518MEMORANDUM ** Darlene Meraz appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of probation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Meraz contends that the district court failed to consider the Sentencing Commission’s Chapter 7 policy statements because the district court made no reference t

MEMORANDUM ** Vernon Ford appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, United States v. Tadeo, 222 F.3d 623, 625 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm. Ford contends that the district court’s sentence was excessive and constituted an abuse of discretion. We are

MEMORANDUM ** Daniel McAnulty appeals his 18-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, United States v. Tadeo, 222 F.3d 623, 625 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm. Appellant contends that the district court abused its discretion when it failed to consider the recom

MEMORANDUM ** Juvenile appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of his juvenile supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Appellant contends that the district court erred by imposing a sentence that exceeded the sentencing range recommended by Chapter 7 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines because the sentence did not compor

MEMORANDUM ** Vernon Ford appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, United States v. Tadeo, 222 F.3d 623, 625 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm. Ford contends that the district court’s sentence was excessive and constituted an abuse of discretion. We are

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Manuel Cuevas-Villelas appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s consideration of nonbinding policy statements set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, United States v. Tadeo, 222 F.3d 623, 625 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

MEMORANDUM ** Cecil Tasby appeals his 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm. Tasby contends that the district court erred by imposing a 24-month sentence following the revocation of his supervised release where U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 advises 5-11 months. Because the rec

MEMORANDUM * Juvenile Male violated the terms of his probation and was sentenced to forty-six months of official detention. On appeal, he contends that the district court erred by failing to consider the Chapter 7 policy statements in imposing his sentence and by imposing a sentence that was contrary to the rehabilitative purpose of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act (FJDA), 18 U.S.C. § 5031, et. seq. Be

MEMORANDUM ** Mikeal James Mavrinac appeals the sentence imposed upon him when his term of supervised release was revoked. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). We vacate the sentence and remand. In light of the facts of this case, except as hereafter noted, it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to decide to impose a lengthy prison sentence upon Mavrinac when it revoke

MEMORANDUM ** Rodger Taylor appeals his 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of probation, subsequent to his underlying sentence of five years of probation, following a conviction for machine gun possession, in violation of 18 USC § 922(o). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm. Taylor contends that the district court erred where it revoked

MEMORANDUM * Allen DePhillipis appeals his 19-month sentence for violating the terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm. DePhillipis contends that the district court lacked authority to depart from the sentencing range of 8-14 months for a Class C felony provided in U.S.S.G. § 7B 1.4(a), and failed to consider bo

253 B.R. 503 (2000) In re STYLESITE MARKETING, INC. f/k/a Diplomat Direct Marketing Corporation, Debtor. Tekinsight.Com, Inc. f/k/a Tadeo Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Stylesite Marketing, Inc. f/k/a Diplomat Direct Marketing Corporation and First Source Financial LLP, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00 B 10099(SMB), Adversary No. 00/2286A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York.

ORDER KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 24), to which Plaintiff responded (DE 27) and Defendants replied (DE 28). Plaintiff BTG Patent Holdings, LLC (“BTG”) brought this case against all Defendants—Bag2Go, GmbH (“Bag2Go”), Reh, Rimowa Distribution, Inc. (“RD”), and Rimowa, Inc. (“Ri-mowa US”)—for trademark infringemen