Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “USA v. Rodriguez”
Exxon Co., USA v. Rodriguezpublic domain
410 So.2d 571 (1982) EXXON COMPANY, U.S.A., and Petroleum Casualty Company, Appellants, v. Fidel RODRIGUEZ, Appellee. No. AC-415. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 16, 1982. Rehearing Denied March 16, 1982. *572 Barry A. Pemsler of Richard, Tharp & Pemsler, Miami, for appellants.</
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DENSYL ALEXIS DIAZ RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as Trustee for Deutsche Alt-A Securities Inc., Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2006-AR2, Appellee. No. 4D22-1478 [November 23, 2022] Appeal of a no
Rodriguez v. Home Depot USA, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Rodriguez appeals the district court’s award of damages and attorney’s fees under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Specifically, Rodriguez contends that the district court erred when it failed to award statutory damages for each incident of discrimination, and that the district court improperly reduced his attorney’s fees award. We have jurisdiction under 28 U
Rodriguez v. Home Depot USA, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Rodriguez appeals the district court’s award of damages and attorney’s fees under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Specifically, Rodriguez contends that the district court erred when it failed to award statutory damages for each incident of discrimination, and that the district court improperly reduced his attorney’s fees award. We have jurisdiction under 28 U
Rodriguez v. Hartfordpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Rodriguez-Munoz v. Atty Gen USApublic domain
OPINION VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge. Richard Jose Rodriguez-Munoz petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition. 1 Rodriguez-Munoz is a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic.
United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Abel Rodriguez-Rodriguez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-diffe
Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Rodriguezpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
State v. Rodriguezpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Rodriguez v. Scottpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Swartz v. Rodriguezpublic domain
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Hernandez v. Mesa , 589 U.S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 735,
Waddleton v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Parr v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Francisco R. Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Francisco Roberto Rodriguez, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2020-000882 Appeal From Spartanburg County G. Thomas Cooper Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 6087 Heard May 8, 2024 – Filed September 4, 2024
Rodriguez v. Heitpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Rodriguez v. Illinoispublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Rodriguez v. Floridapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Rodriguez v. Carsonpublic domain
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *404The United States Housing Act of 1937 establishes a complex scheme of financial assistance to low- and middle-income renters. Section 8 of the Act ("Section 8"), codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1437f, provides for - among other types of aid - "project-based assistance," pursuant to which th
Rodriguez v. Floridapublic domain
*210Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.