Cases

ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: *478Currently pending before the Court are the parties' motions for summary judgment (D.I. 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 316, 356, 411) and Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony and opinions. (D.I. 317, 321, 322, 327). The parties have fully briefed the issues (D.I. 314, 318, 320, 323, 324, 328, 351, 353,

OPINION GORDON J. QUIST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. (Progressive), has sued several Defendants in the United Parcel Services family of companies (collectively referred to herein as UPS) alleging that UPS is liable for trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., and the common law. Progressive a

T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiff, a manufacturer and seller of personal care products for women and men and the owner of the registered trademark VAGISIL, brings this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1071(b) seeking reversal of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision dismissing plaintiff'

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1622 Doc: 60 Filed: 08/09/2023 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1622 DEWBERRY ENGINEERS INC., a New York corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DEWBERRY GROUP, INC., f/k/a Dewberry Capital

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1845 Doc: 45 Filed: 08/09/2023 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1622 DEWBERRY ENGINEERS INC., a New York corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DEWBERRY GROUP, INC., f/k/a Dewberry Capital

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: *940Plaintiff CollegeNet, Inc., brings this antitrust action for violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act against Defendant The Common Application, Inc. Plaintiff brings seven claims for relief: (1) Horizontal Restraint of Trade in the Admissions Markets; (2) Horizontal Restraint of Trade in the Online Colleg

David Nuffer, United States District Judge OVERVIEW This case was tried over 12 days in April and June 2018.1 The United States presented *1121testimony from 25 witnesses, both live and via deposition designation. Defendants rested their case without calling a single witness, but

OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Plaintiff Epic Systems Corporation is suing defendants YourCareUniverse, Inc., MEDHOST of Tennessee, Inc., and MEDHOST Direct, Inc. under both state and federal law on the grounds that defendants’ YOURCAREEVERYWHERE mark infringes Epic’s trademark for CARE EVERYWHERE and results in unfair competition. Defendants have moved for summary judgment

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiff Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) brings this motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) from “making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV