Cases

PER CURIAM: Leonard A. Boyles, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting in part and denying in part Boyles’s motion for summary judgment, affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s final decision with respect to Boyles’s date of continuous disability and denying Boyles’s motion to modify the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated b

This matter came before Associate Justice Todd R. Matha, Associate Justice Trida A. Zunker and Chief Justice Mary Jo Hunter on appeal of the Trial Court’s Order (Partially Granting Motion), CV 09-70 (HCN Tr. Ct., Aug. 19, 2014), contesting the Trial Court’s decision that treated a written submission by Appellee as a motion to recover debts owed to her. This Court convened Oral Argument on February 28, 2015. Attorney William Gardner repre

170 F.Supp.2d 573 (2001) Paul W. BOYLES and Dorothy H. Boyles, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 1:99CV00132. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. August 6, 2001. *574 Mathew E. Bates, Greensboro, NC, for plaintiffs. U.S. Attorney, Office of U.S. Attorney, Greensboro, NC, Christopher J.

James F. McKAY III, Chief Judge. | Richard Boyles appeals his guilty plea to being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm and his sentence as a multiple offender, contending that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm his guilty plea and sentence. STATEMENT OF THE CASE By bill of information file

Opinion PEARCE, Judge: T1 This case considers whether police officers executing a search warrant for a single-level, three-bedroom house needed to obtain a new warrant after they encountered a locked interior door sporting a no-trespassing sign. We conclude that the trial court did not err by determining that the locked door and sign were insufficient to pro

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

PER CURIAM. Michael Scott Boyles pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Concluding Boyles had “three previous convictions ... for a violent felony ... committed on occasions different from one another,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), the district court sentenced Boyles to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years in prison.

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED and Opinion Filed April 30, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01297-CV ERICA WHITLOCK, JERRAMY JAY BOYLES, AND WALTER GALE “TREY” BOYLES, Appellants V. CSI RISK MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellee On Appe

922 N.E.2d 1267 (2010) Francisco and Alisa DELGADO, Appellants-Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. Peter BOYLES and Century 21 Pace Four Seasons, Inc., Appellees-Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. No. 64A04-0911-CV-657. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 16, 2010. *1268 Kevin G. Kerr, Hoeppner Wagner & Evans LLP, Valparaiso, IN, At

213 P.3d 531 (2009) 2009-NMCA-080 Mike SKEEN and Gail Skeen, husband and wife, and Mary Helen Skeen, individually and in her capacity as Attorney-in-Fact for Joseph R. Skeen and Mary Elisa Livingston, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Bob BOYLES, deceased, and Jim Boyles, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 27,910, 28,318. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. June 29, 2009.</

MEMORANDUM OPINION KIM R. GIBSON, UNÍTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction This case arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) from the denial of disability benefits to Plaintiff Robert P. Boyles, Jr. *500(“Boyles”) by American Heritage Life Insurance Co. (“AHL”) and Unum Life Insurance Company of

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-74,607-

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DARRELL EDWARD BOYLES, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO PERSONAL FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REPRESENTATIVE, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D14-5276 v. DILLARD'S INC., Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion file

Boyle, J. (concurring in parí). I agree with parts I, II, ih(a), and iv of the lead opinion. Given that the par*129ties have not presented arguments involving the relationship between “disability,” “earning capacity,” and wages the employee is “able to earn,” I express no opinion regarding the remainder of part m o

157 P.3d 415 (2007) CHD, INC., Appellant, v. Virginia BOYLES, Ann Thompson, and Cassie Thompson, Respondents. No. 24550-1-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three. April 19, 2007. *416 Timothy D. Durkop, Attorney at Law, Spokane Valley, WA, for Appellant. Darwin D. Grewe, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, f

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00040 (CJN) SIDNEY POWELL, et al., Defendants. US DOMINION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00213 (CJN) RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, Defendant. U

677 N.W.2d 531 (2004) 2004 SD 31 Jason BOYLES, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Douglas WEBER, Warden South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent and Appellee. No. 22743. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued January 13, 2004. Decided March 3, 2004. *535 Bruce Ellison, Rapid City, for petition

*134¶1 A party waives the right to contest the underlying obligations on property in a foreclosure proceeding when there is no attempt to use the presale remedies in RCW 61.24.130. In re Marriage of Kaseburg, 126 Wn. App. 546, 558, 108 P.3d 1278 (2005). Virginia Boyles sought a nonjudicial foreclosure on a trust deed granted by CHD, Inc., to secure a promissory note. After receiving notice

LVNV Funding, LLC ("LVNV"), appeals from a judgment denying its motion to vacate a default judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P.1 We reverse and remand. On April 18, 2006, Tammie Lynn (Moncries) Boyles sued LVNV in the Jefferson *Page 1223 Circuit Court ("the circuit court"). In pertinent part, Boyles's complaint alleged that LVNV was "one and the same as Resurgent Capital Ser

800 N.E.2d 616 (2003) Larry Ray BOYLES, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 84A05-0305-PC-255. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 18, 2003. Rehearing Denied March 5, 2004. *617 Robert F. Hellmann, Terre Haute, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of In