Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico v. Efron”
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1858 DAVID EFRON, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED OF PUERTO RICO; UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.; LUZ NEREIDA COLÓN; ENEIDA RODRÍGUEZ; HECTOR SUEIRO-ALVAREZ, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Candelario-Del-Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.public domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. For over four centuries, persons learned in the law have known that, when litigation is in prospect, vigilance is good and somnolence is bad. Commentators and courts have phrased this sentiment in different ways. See, e.g., In re Wood, [1883] 23 Ch.D. 644 at 653 (Eng.) (“It is a reasonable presumption that a man who sleeps upon his rights
Candelario Del Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge. Madeline Candelario del Moral claims to have suffered damages as a result of the negligence of UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico in releasing certain accounts and paying off a credit line in violation of a writ of execution of judgment issued by the Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico (“CFI”) in October 2006. Trial is schedu
Del Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are defendant UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico’s (“UBS”) motion to set aside judgment under Rule 60(b) (Docket # 110), and plaintiff Madeline Candelario Del Moral’s oppositions thereto (Docket # 112).1 After considering the parties’ submissions and the applicable law, the Court DENIES UBS’s
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. OVERVIEW This diversity suit for negligence presents interesting questions of Puerto Rico law in a complex procedural setting, but we will do our best to simplify. The combatants are plaintiff Madeleine Candelario del Moral (“Candelario”) and ' defendant UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico (“UBSPR”). Candelario’s ex-h
Candelario-Del Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are David Efron’s motion to intervene under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2) (Docket # 198), and the parties’ response thereto. Dockets # 199 & 200. After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, Efron’s motion to intervene is DENIED. Factual and Procedural Background A comprehens
Candelario Del Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.public domain
703 F.Supp.2d 79 (2010) Madeline CANDELARIO DEL MORAL, Plaintiff v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED OF PUERTO RICO, Defendants. Civil No. 08-1833 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 9, 2010. *80 Jose Luis Ubarri-Garcia, David W. Roman, Brown & Ubarri, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Enrique G. F
Efron, David v. Brighton Dorado Group, Incpublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII EFRÓN, DAVID Certiorari, procedente del Tribunal Parte Peticionaria de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Bayamón
In re Efronpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER MILDRED CABAN FLORES, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court are two Orders to Show Cause as to (1) why the Court should not abstain from hearing this case which is essentially a two party dispute regarding the division of marital property and therefore serves no bankruptcy purpose and (2) why the case should not be dismissed for failure to pay post-petition domestic support oblig
Efron v. Candelario (In re Efron)public domain
FINKLE, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtor appeals from the bankruptcy court’s April 17, 2014 order and judgment in which it: (1) abstained and dismissed the case pursuant to § 305(a)(1);1 and, alternatively, (2) dismissed the case pursuant to § 1112(b)(4)(E) and (P) due to the debtor’s failure to comply with court orders requiring the payment of post-petition domestic support obligations. The debtor c
Efron, David v. Brighton Dorado Group, Incpublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL EFRÓN, DAVID Certiorari, procedente del Tribunal Parte Recurrida de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Bayamón K