Cases

734 F.Supp.2d 1035 (2010) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. TIMELESS INVESTMENTS, INC. dba EZ Trip Golden State Convenience and Auto/Truck Plaza, and Does 1-5, inclusive, Defendant. No. 1:08-cv-1469 AWI SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 13, 2010. *1042 Anna Y. Park, Amrita Mallik, Lor

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. I. Introduction The U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission (“Plaintiff’) brought this action for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 against Defendant Farmers Insurance Com

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. In this case, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleges that Defendant Alia Corporation (“Alia”) subjected Derrick Morgan (“Morgan”), a former employee, to *1247ad

Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, United States District Court Judge. Pending before the Court are cross-motions for partial . summary judgment. Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed this ac*953tion

ORDER RE EVANS FRUIT CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, INTER ALIA LONNY R. SUKO, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Evans Fruit Co., Inc.’s Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 568) and Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 549). These motions were heard with oral argument on May 17, 2012. BACKGROUND EEOC asks the court to fi

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT ALTRES, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 30, 2011 AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT LA RANA HAWAII, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 30, 2011 LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant ALTRES, Inc.’s (“ALTRES”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed December 30, 2011 (“ALTRES Motion”), filed

497 U.S. 547 (1990) METRO BROADCASTING, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL. No. 89-453. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued March 28, 1990. Decided June 27, 1990.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT *551 Gregory H. Guillot

Opinion PER CURIAM. Separate Opinions filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN and Senior Circuit Judge MacKINNON. Dissenting Opinion filed by Chief Judge WALD. PER CURIAM: The opinions by Judges Silberman and MacKinnon in some respects differ in analysis. However, both conclude that the FCC’s minority distress sale program unconstitutionally deprives Alan Shurberg and Shur

873 F.2d 347 277 U.S.App.D.C. 134, 57 USLW 2619 WINTER PARK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellant,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,Rainbow Broadcasting Company, Metro Broadcasting, Inc.,Winter Park Chamber of Commerce and City of WinterPark, Intervenors.METRO BROADCASTING, INC., Appellant,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,Rainbow Broadcasting Company and Winter Park

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

914 F.Supp. 1084 (1996) Carol Sue HARDING, Wallace E. Harding and Cheryl A. Scull, Plaintiffs, v. DANA TRANSPORT, INC. and Robert Partridge, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-4261(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 25, 1996. *1085 *1086 *1087

OPINION KOZINSKI, Chief Judge. This case presents the question of whether denial of a dredge and fill permit by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344 (1982), constitutes a taking of plaintiff’s property, where the property can be put to no viable economic use without such a permit. Background On September 2

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2025 ME 6 Docket: BCD-23-122 Argued: November 9, 2023 Decided: January 28, 2025 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J.1 Majority: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J. Dissent: DOUGLAS and LAWRENCE, JJ. ROBERT E. DUPUIS et al.

ACCEPTED 13-14-00511-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 2/3/2015 11:05:49 AM DORIAN

108 F.Supp.2d 976 (2000) THOMAS & BETTS CORP. and THOMAS & BETTS HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. PANDUIT CORP., Defendant. No. 94C2656. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 18, 2000. *977 Marc Fogelberg, McBride Baker & Coles, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Sidney David, Stephen F. Ro

MEMORANDUM OPINION BEATY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert N. Hall (“Plaintiff’), appearing pro se, brings multiple claims against Tyco International Ltd. (“Tyco International”), Tyco Electronics Corporation (“Tyco Electronics”), and AMP Inc. (“AMP”). Plaintiffs claims against AMP and Tyco Electronics are essentially the same, as it appears that AMP Inc. was

[J-65-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. ALLEGHENY REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH : No. 26 MAP 2021 CENTER, ALLENTOWN WOMEN'S : CENTER, DELAWARE COUNTY : Appeal from the Orders of the WOMEN'S CENTER, PHILADELPHIA : Commonwealth Court at No. 26 MD WOMEN'S CENTER, PLANNED : 2019 dated January 28, 2020, and PAREN

533 U.S. 289 (2001) IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE v. ST. CYR No. 00-767. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 24, 2001. Decided June 25, 2001. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *290 *291 Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of

109 F.3d 1096 65 USLW 2685 CAUSEWAY MEDICAL SUITE; Hope Medical Group for Women, onbehalf of themselves and the patients they serve,Plaintiffs- Appellees,v.Richard P. IEYOUB, Attorney General of the State ofLouisiana, Michael J. Foster, Jr., Governor, State ofLouisiana, Bobby P. Jindal, Secretary of the LouisianaDepartment of Health and Hospitals, and Madlyn B. Bagneris,Secretary of the

511 U.S. 244 (1994) LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS et al. No. 92-757. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 13, 1993. Decided April 26, 1994. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT *245 *246 Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court,