⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “U.S. Bank National Association v. Jaquez”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-01-26 · Published · cited 27× · 811 F.3d 390; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1215; 2016 WL 303890
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. Amidst the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the Office of the State Bank Commissioner of Kansas declared The Columbian Bank and Trust Company insolvent, seized the bank’s assets, and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver. The FDIC then sold many of the bank’s assets. Columbian Financial Corporation, the bank’s sole shareholder, sued t
Robinson v. Keitapublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2014-02-20 · Published · cited 5× · 20 F. Supp. 3d 1140; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21322; 2014 WL 657408
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed on March 26, 2013. The individual Defendants assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity on Christian Aubin Robinson’s [“Robinson”] claims in the Amended Complaint. Defendant City and County of De
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2021-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 08-21-00135-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 11/2/2021 1:41 PM 08-21-00135-CV ELIZABETH G. FLORES
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
04/08/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 24, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYSHON BOOKER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108568 G. Scott Green, Judge __________________________
Gerhardt v. Marespublic domain
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-01-20 · Published · cited 3× · 179 F. Supp. 3d 1006; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26552; 2016 WL 808039
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Roscoe Woods’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed October 16, 2015 (Doc. 29)(“Woods Motion”); (ii) the Racing Commission Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed October 28, 2015 (Doc. 31)(“Commission Motion”); and (iii) the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to D
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 882 F. Supp. 2d 1123
ORDER RULING ON THE PARTIES’ INDIVIDUAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................1128 II. JUDICIAL STANDARD ..................................................1128 III. FIFTH THIRD’S DEFENSES.............................................1129
District Court, N.D. California · 2006-02-28 · Published · cited 3× · 452 F. Supp. 2d 924; 32 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 779; 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 339; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45617
452 F.Supp.2d 924 (2006) COALITION FOR ICANN TRANSPARENCY INC, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. VERISIGN, INC., a Delaware corporation; Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a California corporation, Defendants. No. C-05-04826 RMW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. February 28, 2006. *
District Court, D. Colorado · 2002-05-22 · Published · cited 27× · 208 F.R.D. 301; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9639; 2002 WL 1050515
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs James Neiberger, Danford El-dridge, Paul Gardner, Terence Jacobs, Bradley Glennie, David Snyders, Lawrence Eu-bank and Allen Hall (“Plaintiffs”) bring claims for violation of the Care and Treatment of the Mentally 111 Act (“Treatment Act”), common law negligence/ negligence per se, violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2007-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued March 1, 2007 In The Court of Appeals <
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2007-05-03 · Published · cited 21× · 222 S.W.3d 19; 2005 WL 1240763
222 S.W.3d 19 (2005) ALON USA, LP and Alon USA GP, Inc., Appellants, The State of Texas, Cross-Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee, Alon USA, LP and Alon USA GP, Inc., Cross-Appellees. No. 03-03-00431-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. May 26, 2005. Rehearing Overruled May 3, 2007. *22 Scott S. Cooley,
Rael v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994-07-25 · Published · cited 13× · 876 P.2d 1210; 1994 WL 161234
Justice VOLLACK dissenting: The majority reverses the summary judgment order and remands to the trial court the issue of whether Jack Taylor, the applicant in the 1960 Torrens action, exercised *1230reasonable diligence to identify parties who should have been named personally and should have received direct notice of the suit through personal servic
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00431-CV Appellants, Alon USA, LP and Alon USA GP, Inc.//Cross-Appellant, The State of Texas v. Appellee, The State of Texas//Cross-Appellees, Alon USA, LP and Alon USA GP, Inc. FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GV102519, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00431-CV Appellants, Alon USA, LP and Alon USA GP, Inc.//Cro
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 IL App (5th) 231205
NOTICE 2025 IL App (5th) 231205 Decision filed 12/11/25. The text of this decision may be NOS. 5-23-1205, 5-23-1213 cons. changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ____________________________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2006-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001-06-25 · Published · cited 216× · 253 F.3d 1234; 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 244; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3313; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14214; 2001 WL 708771
HENRY, Circuit Judge. Seeking to have its motor vehicle registrations and titles recognized by the state of Kansas, the Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians, a Kansas Indian tribe, filed suit against various Kansas state officials pursuant to the Indian Commerce Clause, the Kansas Act for Admission, and other federal law. During the proceedings below, the district court issued a t
Popham v. Holloronpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 1929-03-30 · Published · cited 33× · 275 P. 1099; 84 Mont. 442; 1929 Mont. LEXIS 134
The law pertaining to water appropriations contemplates running water in natural streams, and is an usufructuary right giving no right to the corpus of the water. When water is gathered into ditch or other artificial means of controlling water, and thus reduced to possession, the rule of law is different. When it escapes from the land of the appropriator the water becomes "surface or waste" water, and is not subject to appropriation, except where the statute grants such right. The law