Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Howard Tyson Sr., proceeding pro se, filed this suit in an effort to void *362 foreclosure on his home located at 12018 Long Ridge Lane, Bowie, Maryland. He attempts to state a

MEMORANDUM OPINION MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge. Wells Fargo’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 15), is denied. Nguyen’s cause of action for negligent misrepresentation is dismissed for lack of standing.1 Facts2 Plaintiff Viet Quoc Nguyen and Phung Vu are husband and wife and pre

*685OPINION OF THE COURT Jeffrey Arlen Spinner, J. On September 7, 2007 plaintiff commenced this action claiming foreclosure of a mortgage by filing its notice of pendency and summons and complaint with the Clerk of Suffolk County. The mortgage at issue was originally given in favor of New Century Mortgage Corporation, plaintiff’s assignor. Said mortg

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Shirdena M. Twymon appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo & Company, doing business as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., (Wells Fargo) on her race-based employment discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 196

DONALDSON, Judge. Generally, a party may appeal only from an adverse ruling, not from one granting the relief sought by the party. See Lewis v. Providence Hosp., 483 So.2d 398, 398 (Ala. 1986). Charissa A. Smalls ("Smalls") appeals from the order of the Madison Circuit Court ("the trial court") dismissing a

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge. This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiffs oppose the Motion (Doc. No. 12) and Defendant has filed a Reply in support (Doc. No. 13). A motion to dismiss involuntarily is a dispositive motion on which a Magistrate

DONALDSON, Judge. Generally, a party may appeal only from an adverse ruling, not from one granting the relief sought by the party. See Lewis v. Providence Hosp., 483 So.2d 398, 398 (Ala. 1986). Charissa A. Smalls ("Smalls") appeals from the order of the Madison Circuit Court ("the trial court") dismissing a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Manuel J. Casares has filed a complaint against defendants Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC (“WFA”), Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Robin Cobas, an employee of Wells Fargo Advisors. Plaintiff, who formerly worked as a financial advisor for Wells Fargo Advisors, alleges that he lost his hom

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court is a motion for class certification (“Motion”), filed November 9, 2012 by Edward Huyer, Connie Huyer (the “Huyers”), Carlos Castro, and Hazel NavasCastro (the “Castras”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Clerk’s No. 150. Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (collectively “Defendants” or “Wells Fargo”) timely resisted the Motion on January

*66 MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Harold J. Taylor filed suit against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, and HSBC Bank USA, NA. (collectively, “Defendants”), asserting ten causes of action

ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Receiver’s Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 228), the opposition of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“the Bank”) (Dkt. 255), the Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 231), and the Receiver’s opposition (Dkt. 251). As requested, supplemental briefs were filed by the Bank (Dkt.

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER', Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Wells Fargo Bank N.A. d/b/a/ Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (Wells Fargo), Keth Malone, and Brian Freese (collectively, Defendants), as well as Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Petition and Jury Demand and Motion for Leave to Amend Second Amended Petition and Jury Demand by Plaintiffs Rachelle

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-CV-1025 DENNIS T. COMER, APPELLANT, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00033-CV PAUL FLORES APPELLANT V. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL APPELLEES TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR FREMONT HOME LOAN; WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. D/B/A AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY; AND BRICE, VANDER LINDEN & WERNICK, P.C.

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. appeals the District Court’s Amended Order granting Appellee Titus Oparaji’s motion for summary judgment on the theory of judicial estoppel. For the reasons explained below, we find that judicial estop-pel is not warranted. We REVERSE and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DIETZ, Judge. This case presents an issue of first impression involving N.C. Gen. Stat. § 45-36.6(b), a statute that permits rescission of a notice of satisfaction for a security instrument if that instrument was "erroneously satisfied." The parties have two competing interpretations of t

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1156 ___________ Shirdena M. Twymon, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the S

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00148-CV BRIAN K. HAREN AND SUSAN K. APPELLANTS HAREN F/K/A SUSAN C. CARLEY V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN E. OTT, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This action originally filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Bessemer Division, was removed to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446 by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), which'the parties dispute to be either a “counter-defendant” or a “third-party defendant.” (Doc.1