Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID PETERSEN; JAY No. 24-1044 STICKNEY; BEAU WATSON; D.C. No. EVAN MERRITT; NORM ALAN 2:22-cv-01674- PETERSON II; RILEY KORF; TSZ RYAN STUPEY; KEVIN GLEASON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPINION v. SNOHOMISH REGIONAL FIRE AND RESCU

BEASLEY, Judge. *451International Fidelity Ins., Co., Beasley Bail Bonding Company, Inc. (Surety) appeals the trial court’s final judgment granting it partial relief. For the following reasons, we affirm. On 4 September 2009, Marsha Lynn Williams (Defendant) was charged with operating a motor vehicle while subject to an impairing substance, and opera

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, 2013 IL App (1st) 122447 Appellate Court THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Caption Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS EDUCATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, LYNNE O. SERED, IELRB Chairman

Case: 24-10708 Document: 132-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

666 F.Supp.2d 651 (2009) Kirk David MARSH, Kirk Russel Marsh and Marsh Investment Group, LLP, Plaintiffs v. Alden M. WALLACE III, Priscilla P. Wallace, Nell Wallace, Wallace Rentals, LLC, Harold Wright, Richard O'Dom, John Howell and Howell Law Firm, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:07CV60TSL-JCS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division. October 20, 2009.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. The motions presently before the Court in this matter concern the interpretation of the words “any ease,” as these are used in the provision which limits the amount of compensation that may be paid to informers under the moiety statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1619(c). Plaintiff White & Case LLP alleges that it provided original information regarding ninety-eigh

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: The question in this case is whether, under federal common law applicable to carriage of goods by air, defendants have successfully limited their liability by contractual provisions in their air waybills. Plaintiff Read-Rite Corp. (“Read-Rite”) contracted with defendants Burlington Air Express Ltd. (“Burlington”) and Cargolux Air

hMcMANUS, Judge. This appeal arises from the conviction and sentence of Ulysses Jones, Jr. for the first degree murder of Jefferson Parish Deputy James Clarius in violation of LSA-R.S.14:30. The jury voted unanimously to convict Ulysses Jones, Jr.; however, it deadlocked during the penalty phase of the trial. Subsequently, the trial court sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment without the benefit of parole, probation, or

146 P.3d 423 (2006) 1000 VIRGINIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership, Respondent, v. VERTECS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Petitioner, Arnie Schmidt and Jane Doe Schmidt, a marital community, d/b/a Northern States Construction; Accountable Waterproofing, a Washington corporation; Washington Insulation, Inc., a Washington corporation; KJ Roofing, a Washington corporation; S.Q.I., Inc., a Washington corporation; Ever

APPEL, Justice (specially concurring). I join in the majority opinion, but write to review the foundations of the well-established Iowa law that we jealously reserve our right to construe our state constitution independently of decisions of the United States Supreme Court interpreting parallel provisions of the Federal Constitution. I. Historic Role of State Constitutions.

940 So.2d 331 (2005) Michael IRVIN v. STATE of Alabama. CR-01-2229. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. June 24, 2005. Rehearing Denied November 18, 2005. Certiorari Denied April 21, 2006. *339 Kyla L. Groff Kelim, Alexander City, for appellant. William H. Pryor, Jr., and Troy King, atty

BROCK, C.J. The State appeals the Superior Court’s (Groff, J.) ruling that the testimony of two alleged sexual assault victims is not admissible in criminal prosecutions against the defendants, Joel Hungerford and John Morahan. See RSA 606:10, II (1986). We affirm and remand. For our limited review of the underlying facts, we will rely on the findings that the trial court made for purposes

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an award of attorneys’ fees in an action brought to secure a free appropriate public education for a handicapped child. Plaintiff Thomas F. Smith, III is a handicapped child suffering from cerebral palsy and a variety of physical and emotional handicaps. Since December 1974 he h

125 Wn.2d 413 (1994) 886 P.2d 172 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, Respondent, v. SAFETY FACTORS, INC., Appellant. No. 60970-5. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. December 15, 1994. *416 James V. Handmacher (of Bonneville, Viert, Morton & McGoldrick), for appellant. Barbara St

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nevada in a diversity case. Jurisdiction is under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The sole issue is whether the action against the appellant insurance company is barred by the time limitations set out in the policy. On January 28, 1965 a burglary of th

Opinion by Mr. Justice Schaffer, In this bill in equity, plaintiff alleges that three certain deeds, one to F. Lynwood Garrison, another by him to the Chrome Mining Company, and the third, from the receivers of the Tyson Mining Company to the Chrome Mining Company, constitute a cloud on complainant’s title and prays they may be set aside and annulled. The chancellor, after hearing, granted the relief prayed fo

The will of decedent reads thus: "July 16-1925 I Geo. L. H. Dommell from this day on request that at my death every thing that is mine should be turned over to my wife Ivy, such as my home 1060 Columbia Ave all my real a state lots; and properties, money and all personal things and that she should see that Faith Church should get five Hundred dollars, and one thousand dollars put on interest for my boy De Von till he is *Page 511 of age, and at her death

Lewis, J., This matter comes before the court on the first and also the final account of Albert M. Greenfield, receiver for the above-named defendants collectively, known as the “Producers and Consumers Bank.” Numerous petitions and claims have been filed, which, if allowed, will necessitate changes in the accounts as filed. Several hearings were had upon the said petitions and claims, at which testimony was given on behalf of t

The opinion of the court was delivered, by Read, J. The law of bills of exchange owes much of its scientific and liberal character to the wisdom of the great jurist of his age, Lord Mansfield, who was sometimes in advance of his contemporaries in attempting to introduce equitable principles in suits at common law. What was then disapproved would now be approved; and Lord Penzance in the House of Lords supported th

SELDEN, J. To avoid confusion, I shall consider this casein the first instance as though the Morris Canal and Baning Company, instead of the State of Indiana, was the clainint upon the record. The general ground upon which *168the claim is resisted is, that' it arises upon an illegal corn tract. Three grounds of illegality are alleged: 1. That the purchase of state stocks b