Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tyler v. Cain”
State ex rel. Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
In re Tyler III, James; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 175,282. Denied.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
State Ex Rel. Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
45 So.3d 1038 (2010) STATE ex rel. James TYLER, III v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary. No. 2009-KP-2034. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 17, 2010. Denied.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 531 U.S. 1051.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court. Under Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U. S. 39 (1990) (per curiam), a jury instruction is unconstitutional if there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury understood the instruction to allow conviction without proof beyond a reasonable doubt.1 In *659this
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 531 U.S. 1051.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.
Tyler v. Cain, Wardenpublic domain
535 U.S. 996 TYLERv.CAIN, WARDEN. No. 01-8227. Supreme Court of the United States. April 15, 2002. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
State ex rel. Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
In re Tyler, Melvin; — Plaintiff/s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 250-524. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
State Ex Rel. Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
684 So.2d 950 (1996) STATE ex rel. Melvin TYLER v. N. Burl CAIN, Warden. No. 95-KH-0614. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 19, 1996. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Michael Cain Carden v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-19-00274-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MICHAEL CAIN CARDEN, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Maurice v. Cain v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-13-00178-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MAURICE V. CAIN, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMI
Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.public domain
817 F.Supp.2d 1251 (2011) Michael CAIN and Jennifer Cain, Individuals, Plaintiffs, v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., a Florida corporation; and Willamette Valley Medical Center, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Wylie Steel Fabricators, Inc., a Tennessee corporation; and Earl Swensson Associates, Inc., a Tennessee corporation; Third-Party Defendants. No. CV. 09-723-HU.
City of Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Unless such action was demanded by the decision of the federal Supreme Court in Village of Norwood v. Baker, 172 U.S. 269, 19 Sup.Ct. 187,43 L.Ed. 443, or the decision of the Supreme Court of this state in Hutcheson v. Storrie, 92 Tex. 685, 51 S.W. 848, 45 L.R.A. 289, 71 Am.St.Rep. 884,
Graham v. Tyler Countypublic domain
983 S.W.2d 882 (1998) Patsy Ruth GRAHAM and Willis Graham, Appellants, v. TYLER COUNTY, Appellee. No. 09-97-073CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted on December 3, 1998. Decided December 31, 1998. *883 Jerry A. Pusch, Pusch, Lowery & Gilcrease, Houston, for appellant. Todd L. Kassaw, Rober
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-01-00022-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS WILMA EARL CAIN, WANDA CAIN-COOKS, § APPEAL FROM THE INDIVIDU
Cain v. Esthetiquepublic domain
*57MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pro se plaintiff Ileen Cain brings this action against Atelier Esthetique Institute of Esthetics, Inc. (“Atelier”), alleging defamation and discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (the “Rehabilitation Act”), and the New York City Human Rights Law,
Cain v. Jacoxpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: Danitra Cain appeals from tire denial of her motion to recover postjudgment interest on unpaid child support judgments. The district court denied the motion holding that the doctrine of res judicata barred Cain’s claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed. But we hold that because Cain was neither a part
Cain, Maurice v.public domain
02 ft l <@ 161 RE: MATTERS OF HABEAS APPLICATION DATE: 02/06/2015 CAUSE NO. 241-0010-13-A EX PARTE MAURICE CAIN IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, IN AUSTIN. cAusE No. wR a 82', 716 _- 02 l n RECEWEDHN v COURT OF CHWMNAL APPEALS oRIGINAL PETITION FOR wRIT oF MANDAMUS ' FEB 2()2015 To THE HONORABLE JUDGE_(S) OF SAID COURT: AWAGM@,CFQFR comes Now, MAURICE cAIN, RELATOR herein, and files this "oRIGINAL PETITION EOR wRIT oF MANDAMUS" complaining of "THE ABUSE oF DISCRETION THROUG