⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tyler v. Cain”

Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 45 So. 3d 1038; 2010 La. LEXIS 1985
In re Tyler III, James; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 175,282. Denied.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 996
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 45 So. 3d 1038; 2010 WL 3912230
45 So.3d 1038 (2010) STATE ex rel. James TYLER, III v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary. No. 2009-KP-2034. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 17, 2010. Denied.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 940; 121 S. Ct. 1400
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 531 U.S. 1051.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-06-28 · Published · cited 828× · 150 L. Ed. 2d 632; 121 S. Ct. 2478; 533 U.S. 656; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4909
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court. Under Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U. S. 39 (1990) (per curiam), a jury instruction is unconstitutional if there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury understood the instruction to allow conviction without proof beyond a reasonable doubt.1 In *659this
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 940
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 531 U.S. 1051.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 996
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Tyler v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 531 U.S. 1051; 121 S. Ct. 654
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 535 U.S. 996; 122 S. Ct. 1559
535 U.S. 996 TYLERv.CAIN, WARDEN. No. 01-8227. Supreme Court of the United States. April 15, 2002. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 684 So. 2d 950; 1996 La. LEXIS 3672
In re Tyler, Melvin; — Plaintiff/s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 250-524. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 684 So. 2d 950; 1996 WL 751530
684 So.2d 950 (1996) STATE ex rel. Melvin TYLER v. N. Burl CAIN, Warden. No. 95-KH-0614. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 19, 1996. Denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2020-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-19-00274-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MICHAEL CAIN CARDEN, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2014-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-13-00178-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MAURICE V. CAIN, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMI
District Court, D. Oregon · 2011-09-13 · Published · cited 10× · 817 F. Supp. 2d 1251; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104134; 2011 WL 4072028
817 F.Supp.2d 1251 (2011) Michael CAIN and Jennifer Cain, Individuals, Plaintiffs, v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., a Florida corporation; and Willamette Valley Medical Center, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Wylie Steel Fabricators, Inc., a Tennessee corporation; and Earl Swensson Associates, Inc., a Tennessee corporation; Third-Party Defendants. No. CV. 09-723-HU.
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918-05-23 · Published · cited 1× · 204 S.W. 473; 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 648
Unless such action was demanded by the decision of the federal Supreme Court in Village of Norwood v. Baker, 172 U.S. 269, 19 Sup.Ct. 187,43 L.Ed. 443, or the decision of the Supreme Court of this state in Hutcheson v. Storrie, 92 Tex. 685, 51 S.W. 848, 45 L.R.A. 289, 71 Am.St.Rep. 884,
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 1998-12-31 · Published · cited 9× · 983 S.W.2d 882; 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 8139; 1998 WL 918215
983 S.W.2d 882 (1998) Patsy Ruth GRAHAM and Willis Graham, Appellants, v. TYLER COUNTY, Appellee. No. 09-97-073CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted on December 3, 1998. Decided December 31, 1998. *883 Jerry A. Pusch, Pusch, Lowery & Gilcrease, Houston, for appellant. Todd L. Kassaw, Rober
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-01-00022-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS WILMA EARL CAIN, WANDA CAIN-COOKS, § APPEAL FROM THE INDIVIDU
Cain v. Esthetiquepublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-04-20 · Published · cited 13× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 54; 2016 WL 1599490; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53043
*57MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pro se plaintiff Ileen Cain brings this action against Atelier Esthetique Institute of Esthetics, Inc. (“Atelier”), alleging defamation and discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (the “Rehabilitation Act”), and the New York City Human Rights Law,
Cain v. Jacoxpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 66× · 302 Kan. 431; 354 P.3d 1196; 2015 Kan. LEXIS 444
The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: Danitra Cain appeals from tire denial of her motion to recover postjudgment interest on unpaid child support judgments. The district court denied the motion holding that the doctrine of res judicata barred Cain’s claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed. But we hold that because Cain was neither a part
Cain, Maurice v.public domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
02 ft l <@ 161 RE: MATTERS OF HABEAS APPLICATION DATE: 02/06/2015 CAUSE NO. 241-0010-13-A EX PARTE MAURICE CAIN IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, IN AUSTIN. cAusE No. wR a 82', 716 _- 02 l n RECEWEDHN v COURT OF CHWMNAL APPEALS oRIGINAL PETITION FOR wRIT oF MANDAMUS ' FEB 2()2015 To THE HONORABLE JUDGE_(S) OF SAID COURT: AWAGM@,CFQFR comes Now, MAURICE cAIN, RELATOR herein, and files this "oRIGINAL PETITION EOR wRIT oF MANDAMUS" complaining of "THE ABUSE oF DISCRETION THROUG