Cases

‘S _ .~;_¢ § q-~\S~\SDS,` b COVRT ©F cRIv)/\Tn)m lD. ,i>em_§ ` _f§§» (Ml '” r P_. o. Bc>x \1308,CAPLTQL sTAm@v Cz\us.ef\\')o nng co A~\)§,Tr\\) , T&>,7'\\ ' "I REZ MOT`.YO\\) »Pof f€QD€S‘\e§ €vi&€Muarq¥\th-Agf §Upo\e/_r\@-i( T¢> err oF HABE¢\§/ o¥ S*m€‘$ AP¢>@\ ‘Bn‘~@£. ~ _Re€erec) +v 05 " grew B-¢Q/' m -H\~P> ~€@r Hobea.s L‘c>'rx)v$.£>~mov\£*'l ,,:?; l’ v\& .I__‘B_____NFO ""\‘\T

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 14, 2019, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Defendant. FINDING OF LIABILITY For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion, the Court hereby GRANTS the plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. Specifically, the Court holds as follows: 1. As to Count I, defendant the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) is LIABLE to the following plaintiffs: (1) Steven Vernier, Jr.; (2

I 1 WRIT NUMBER: WR-60-547-13 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN,TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL* FEB 23 2015 EX PARTE Alb8lAoos£a8CI@irk DANIEL JAMES SIXTA APPLICANT.

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM

14‐2027 In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

ACCEPTED 12-15-00005CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 10:02:33 AM

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi

141 Nev., Advance Opinion (LI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL No. 89838 CENTER AND EMILIE C. HYLAND, RN, Petitioners, vs. FILED THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

OPINION THUMMA, Judge: ¶ 1 By statute, an appeal may be taken from “a final judgment entered in an action.” A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(1) (2016).1 Consistent with this directive, the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure describe two types of “final judgments:” (1) a “final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties,” Ariz. R. Civ. P. 54(b), and (2) a final judgm

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

157 S.W.3d 434 (2005) In re U.S. SILICA CO. et al. In re Badger Mining Corp. In re Norton Co., et al. In re Norton Co. (n/k/a/ Saint Gordon Abrasives) Siebe North Inc. and Textron Inc. In re Bacou-Dalloz Safety, Inc. Nos. 04-0270, 04-0271, 04-0297, 04-0308, 04-0309. Supreme Court of Texas. February 11, 2005. Henry S. Platts, David E. Sharp, Beirne Maynard &a;

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV