Cases

634 N.W.2d 811 (2001) 10 Neb. App. 570 Wilson P. HILL, Appellee, v. Twyla J. HILL, Appellant. No. A-00-867. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. October 2, 2001. *813 Paul M. Conley, Lincoln, for appellant. Amie C. Martinez, of Anderson, Creager & Wittstruck, P.C., Lincoln, for appellee. HANNON,

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Andrew Michael Baker was a disabled child who was killed in a horrifying way while he was under the care of the foster parents to whom he was entrusted by representatives of Wisconsin’s Grant County Department of Social Services. His mother, Linda Hutchinson, along with her co-plaintiffs, tried to *897bring this action in federal court as

126 F.3d 895 7 A.D. Cases 599, 25 A.D.D. 17 Linda HUTCHINSON, on behalf of Andrew Michael BAKER and inher own right, Twyla Jane Baker, a minor, Amy Lynn Baker, aminor, Robert Raymond Hutchinson, a minor, and Katie AnnHutchinson, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.David SPINK, Karen Spink, Grinnell Mutual ReinsuranceCompany, Debbie Donald, Steven Obershaw, JonAngeli, and Kill Brothers Company,

Ralph T. Smith, Jr. (“Defendant”), was charged with the class A felony of robbery in the first degree with what appeared to be a deadly weapon, pursuant to section 569.020, and the class B felony of robbery in the second degree, pursuant to section 569.030.1 A jury found Defendant guilty of both offenses, and the trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender to thirty years in prison on each robbery, with

901 P.2d 1107 (1995) H. Douglas MILLER and Danene R. Miller, individually and as conservator(s) of Laura K. Miller, Lindy L. Miller and Clint T. Miller, minors; Steve Adams and Peggy Adams, individually and as conservator(s) of Christie Adams and Jamie Adams, minors; Scott G. Anderson and Tobey J. Anderson, individually and as conservator(s) of Michael Todd Anderson, Chanel S. Anderson, and Tobin P. Anderson, minors; Paul D. Bailey, Jr.; Roxanne G. Randa

THOMAS, Justice. The question presented in this appeal is novel to Wyoming, and it is substantially unique in American jurisprudence. Can the collateral source rule be invoked in favor of plaintiffs who are seeking compensation for inverse condemnation? The appellants in this case (homeowners) were ordered to evacuate their residences in a subdivision of Gillette known as Rawhide Village Subdivision. The reason for the eva

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV