Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Turner v. National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago”
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH No. 24-1570 AND MANUFACTURERS OF D.C. No. AMERICA, 6:19-cv-01996- MO Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OPINION ANDREW R. STOLFI, in his official capacity as Director of the Ore
Seitz-Partridge v. Loyola University of Chicagopublic domain
948 N.E.2d 219 (2011) Jeanine SEITZ-PARTRIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Alan Wolfe, Adam Driks, Allen Frankfater, Gayatri Vedantam and David Keating, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-09-3550. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. March 31, 2011. *222 Potratz & Hollander, P.C., C
Seitz-Partridge v. Loyola University of Chicagopublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MARCH 31, 2011 1-09-3550 JEANINE SEITZ-PARTRIDGE, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook Co
OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Plaintiff Sabina Burton is now a tenured associate professor of criminal justice at the University of Wiseonsin-Platteville (UWP). Several years ago, Burton advocated for a student who complained of sexual harassment at the hands of another UWP professor. Burton contends that, as a consequence of her advocacy for this student and her subsequent efforts to asse
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Boardpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and integrity of this
MEMORANDUM OPINION KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. I.Introduction This case arises from Plaintiff Seamus Johnston’s allegations that Defendants discriminated against him based on his sex and his transgender status1 by prohibiting him from using sex-segregated locker rooms and restrooms that were designated for men. Although the parties have submitted
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Estate of Alvarez v. Johns Hopkins Universitypublic domain
DECISION RE: THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Marvin J. Garbis, United States District Judge The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6) to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint [ECF No. 133] and the materials submitted relating thereto. The Court has held a hearing and had the benefit of the arguments of counsel. 1. BACKGROUND1<
Amidon v. Student Ass'n of the State Universitypublic domain
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: In this appeal from a November 7, 2005 judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (David N. Hurd, Judge), we decide whether the Student Association (“SA”) of the State University of New York at Albany (“SUNY-Albany”) violated the First Amendment by using an advisory student referendum to determine how to allocate funds from a mandatory student activi
In Re: Conservatorship of Jack Wayne Turnerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 19, 2014 Session IN RE: CONSERVATORSHIP OF JACK WAYNE TURNER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 12P305 David Randall Kennedy, Judge No. M2013-01665-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 9, 2014 This is a conservatorship modification case. Appellant/Mother sought modifi
McDonald v. City of Chicagopublic domain
Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor join, dissenting. In my view, Justice Stevens has demonstrated that the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of “substantive due process” does not include a general right to keep and bear firearms for purposes of private self-defense. As he argues, the Framers did not write the Second Amendment with this objective in view. See
John McAdams v. Marquette Universitypublic domain
DANIEL KELLY, J. *712¶ 1 Marquette University suspended a tenured faculty member because of a blog post criticizing an encounter between an instructor and a student. Dr. John McAdams took exception to his suspension, and brought a claim against the University for breach of contract. He asserts that the contract guarantees to him the right to
John McAdams v. Marquette Universitypublic domain
2018 WI 88 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP1240 COMPLETE TITLE: John McAdams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marquette University, Defendant-Respondent. ON BYPASS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FILED: July 6, 2018
Butters v. James Madison Universitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge In this action, plaintiff Sarah Butters brings a claim against James Madison University (JMU) under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a), which prohibits certain educational institutions from discriminating “on the basis of sex.”1 Her complaint alleges that, while she w
USCA11 Case: 22-11707 Document: 152-3 Date Filed: 08/28/2024 Page: 1 of 173 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11707 ____________________ PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, Rev., BRIANNA BOE, individually and on behalf of her
Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Judge Having uncovered what she believed to be Medicare fraud, Holly Rockey brought *809this qui tam suit against her former employer and all nine of its doctors and audiologists (collectively, “Ear Institute Defendants”), as well as its billing contractor (“Tre
698 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2010) Chad Leroy LISDAHL, Plaintiff, v. MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, d/b/a Mayo Medical Transport, a/k/a Gold Cross Ambulance, and David B. Johnson, individually, Defendants. Civ. No. 07-3708 (RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 1, 2010. *1083 George C. Aucoin, The
Cooper v. University of Texas at Dallaspublic domain
482 F.Supp. 187 (1979) Mary Weis COOPER v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. Civ. A. No. CA-3-75-1510-G. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. December 10, 1979. *188 *189 Steven B. Thorpe, James C. Barber, Martin Frost, Law Offices of James C. Barber, Dallas, Tex., for plai
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Baltimore City Ordinance 09-252 mandates that pregnancy centers that do not offer abortions or refer for abortions must post one or more signs in their waiting rooms, stating that they “do[ ] not provide or make referral for abortion or birth-control services.” On the plaintiffs’ assertion that such a sign requires them to speak contrary to their moral and religio
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 17-3163 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern