Cases

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was filed on May 7, 2012. (Doc. No. 44). Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss the First Ame

LAVINE, J., dissenting. After listening to the evidence in this case and assessing the testimony of the plaintiff, Deborah A. Lombardi, the jury decided to award $3293.16 in economic damages, the entire amount of medical expenses and lost wages claimed. The jury also decided to award no noneconomic damages for pain and suffering. The trial court granted the plaintiffs motion to set as

230 Cal.App.2d 191 (1964) 40 Cal. Rptr. 899 MARY NICKEL LOMBARDI, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. MARSDEN S. BLOIS, as Trustee, etc., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents. MARSDEN S. BLOIS, as Trustee, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MARY NICKEL LOMBARDI et al., Defendants and Appellants. (Consolidated Cases.) Docket No. 21690. <

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 102) and Defendant Chandler’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 104). These motions are fully briefed and ready for disposition. BACKGROUND At all times relevant, Plaintiff Terry M. Turner (“Plaintiff’) w

586 F.Supp. 589 (1984) Leonard SAFLEY, et al., and Mary Webb, et al., individually and as a class of similarly situated people, Plaintiffs, v. William R. TURNER, et al., and David Blackwell, et al., Defendants. Nos. 81-0891-CV-W-6, 82-0072-CV-W-6. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. May 7, 1984. *590 Floyd R. Finch,

674 F.3d 420 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio TURNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-60917. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 7, 2012. *426 Gregory Layne Kennedy (argued), Erin O'Leary Chalk, Asst. U.S. Attys., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Clarence T. Guthrie, III (arg

Aarons, J. Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 12, 2016, which, among other things, found that claimant failed to specify issues or grounds for review, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed February 3, 2016, which granted a request by the workers’ compensation carrier to reopen claimant’s workers’ compensation claim, and (3) fr

SETH, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This is an appeal of the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PARRILLO, P.J.A.D. By leave granted, defendant the Township of Irvington (defendant or Township) appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment dismissal of those counts of plaintiffs’ complaint seeking to hold defendant vicariously liable for the conduct of its employees. Defendant argues that N.J.S.A. 52:17C-10(d), which immunizes 9-1-1 operato

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Domenic Lombardi pled guilty on August 12, 1992, to six counts of a nine-count superseding indictment, the remaining counts being dismissed at the government’s behest. The nature and interrelationship of the charges is critical to an understanding of the ease. Three of the counts to which Lombardi pled guilty charged conspiracy to commit mail

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-2450 No. 93-1008 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v.

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an option to purchase real property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered November 20, 1987, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, dismissed her complaint. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’

DAUGHERTY, District Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Curtis Lombardi appeals from a District Court order dismissing his Bivens action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We agree with the dismissal and affirm. Plaintiff Lombardi was hired by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in August, 1980, as a Presidential Management Intern. Presidential Management Intern positions are short-term position

889 F.2d 959 Curtis LOMBARDI, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, (SBA); James Sanders,individually and in his official capacity as Administratorof the SBA; Michael Cardenas, individually and in hisofficial capacity as Administrator of the SBA; RobertTurnbull, individually and in his official capacity asActing Administrator of the SBA; Joe Mass, individually andin his official capacity as Directo

PER CURIAM. Steve Campbell, an inmate at the Farmington Correctional Center (FCC) in Missouri, filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Campbell alleges that the FCC’s grooming regulation for prisoners, which prohibits “long hair,” violates his constitutional right to freely exercise his religious beliefs because as a follower of the Nazarite religion it is forbidden tha

167 Conn. 392 (1974) RALPH LOMBARDI v. CHARLES BOCKHOLDT Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued November 12, 1974. Decision released December 17, 1974. HOUSE, C. J., LOISELLE, MACDONALD, BOGDANSKI and LONGO, JS. *393 Ralph Lombardi, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Norman Ebenstein, for the appellee (d

330 A.2d 416 (1975) Gilda LOMBARDI v. The DRYDEN CORP. No. 73-215-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. January 17, 1975. *417 Anthony E. Grilli, Paul J. DiMaio, Providence, for plaintiff. Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, John T. Walsh, Jr., Providence, for defendant. OPINION KELLEHER, J. In

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Reverend Larry Rice, Reverend Raymond Redlich, and New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as New Life) argue that the policy of the Missouri Department of Corrections banning cameras in the execution chamber violates plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights of public access. The District Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Yu Kikumura is a prisoner in the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. He is *594 serving a 262-month sentence following a conviction for explosives and passport offenses. 1 He is suing C.A. Turner, the pris

*178 LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Kurt B. Knight appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his § 1983 suit against four corrections officials at the Missouri State Penitentiary. He claims that his First Amendment and procedural due process rights were