Cases

Justice PLEICONES. I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I agree with the majority that a mere breach of industry standards does not give rise to a tort action, and, further, that the second certified question should be answered “yes.” As explained below, I do not join the majority’s ruling which would extend the narrow exception' to the economic loss rule created in Kennedy v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Randall Hoover et al. v. Civil No. 15-cv-367-JL Opinion No. 2016 DNH 192 Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc., et al. MEMORANDUM ORDER This insurance coverage action requires the court to apply the limitations period in a health care coverage plan. Plaintiffs Randall Hoover and Barbara Hoover sued to recove

792 F.Supp. 1484 (1991) Jacob A. HOOVER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RECREATION EQUIPMENT CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 89-CV-1896. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. March 8, 1991. *1485 *1486 Eugene G. Godward, Lawrence Comanor, Comanor & Godward, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, for plainti

763 F.Supp. 210 (1989) Jacob A. HOOVER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RECREATION EQUIPMENT CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 89-CV-1896. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. October 4, 1989. *211 *212 Eugene G. Godward, Lawrence Comanor, Comanor & Godward, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, for plaintif

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

Oct 02 2015, 9:32 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE THE Joseph E. Allman TRUSTEES OF INDIANA Macey Swanson and Allman UNIVERSITY Indianapolis, Indiana Cory Brundage Cory Brundage LLC

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge *835The plaintiffs allege that they were employed as cable television installers by the defendants, who misclassified them as independent contractors to avoid paying them overtime premium wages required by the Fair Labor Standards Act. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),

[Cite as Meredith v. ARC Indus., Inc. of Franklin Cty., 2024-Ohio-4466.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Christopher Meredith, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 24AP-117 v. : (C.P.C. No. 23CV-960) ARC

351 Pa. Superior Ct. 51 (1985) 505 A.2d 259 Elton C. TURNER v. LETTERKENNY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, the Board of Directors of Letterkenny Federal Credit and William T. Grier, Charles G. Hoover, Gaylord L. Peters, Adrian E. Reeder, Doris E. Timmons, James H. Miller, Stanley E. Sprankle, Bruce C. Hershey and Richard E. Baumunk, of the Board of Directors of Letterkenny Federal Credit Union, Appellants. <

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF ##35-37) AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge. In 2012 or 2013, Plaintiffs Timothy Ker-rigan, Lori Mikovich, and Ryan M. Valli (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) each paid money to Defendant ViSalus, Inc. (“ViSalus”) for the opportunity to sell ViSalus’ weight-lo

DONOVAN, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Wright State Physicians, Inc. (hereinafter "WSP"), and defendants-appellants Margaret Dunn, M.D., and Jerome Yaklic, M.D., appeal a judgment, pursuant to jury verdict, of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiff-appellee Lawrence Amesse, M.D., Ph.D., on his claims for breach of contract, employment discrimination, and retali

72 Cal.App.3d 804 (1977) 140 Cal. Rptr. 475 MORLEY TURNER et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY, Respondent; BERNARD E. COOKE et al., Real Parties in Interest. BERNARD E. COOKE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY, Respondent; MORLEY TURNER et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket Nos. 3518, 3528. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth Dis

FILED Apr 25 2024, 8:57 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

OPINION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. Before the Court at this time are the Plaintiff Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company’s (“Grand Trunk”) and Defendant Rieth-Riley Construction Company’s (“Ri-eth-Riley”) cross-motions for partial summary judgment and summary judgment, respectively. The question in this case is whether Rieth-Riley is an “owner” or “operator” of a loading dock on land

890 N.E.2d 73 (2008) Brennen BAKER, Appellant/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, and Moisture Management, Appellant/Third-Party Defendant, v. TREMCO INCORPORATED and Rick Gibson, Appellees/Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs. No. 29A02-0711-CV-1001. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 16, 2008. *76 Andrew W

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS PURSUANT TO RULE 23 JON P. McCALLA, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ renewed Motion to Certify Class (Docs. 435 & 436, originally filed Sept. 26, 2005) and supporting memoranda (Docs. 523, 553, 559, and 567). Defendant Headwaters, Inc. (“Headwaters”) responded in opposition to the original motion (Doc. 458) and the supplemental memoranda (D

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge. This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiff, Lapolla Industries, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Lapolla”), seeking a judgment declaring that the Defendant insurers are obligated to defend and indemnify Plaintiff in connection with a personal injury action now pending in this court (the “Underlying Action”). Presently before the court is the motion of Defendants

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 13-15-00013-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/24/2015 8:12:32 PM

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 11 2019, 5:29 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral