⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Turner Machine Co., Inc. v. Valeo Lighting Systems North America, LLC”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 126× · 603 U.S. 707
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 74× · 603 U.S. 707
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 707–798 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 603 U.S. 707
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 16, 2024 Decided December 6, 2024 No. 24-1113 TIKTOK INC. AND BYTEDANCE LTD., PETITIONERS v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 24-1130, 24-1183 On Petitions for Revi
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002-05-31 · Published · cited 12× · 201 F. Supp. 2d 401; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9537; 2002 WL 1126046
201 F.Supp.2d 401 (2002) AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., v. UNITED STATES, et al. Multnomah County Public Library, et al., v. United States of America, et al. Nos. CIV.A. 01-1303, CIV.A. 01-1322. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 31, 2002. *402 *403 <
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCSC-6 No. 231A18 Filed 5 February 2021 THE COMMITTEE TO ELECT DAN FOREST, A POLITICAL COMMITTEE v. EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (EMPAC), A POLITICAL COMMITTEE Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCSC-6 No. 231A18 Filed 5 February 2021 THE COMMITTEE TO ELECT DAN FOREST, A POLITICAL COMMITTEE v. EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (EMPAC), A POLITICAL COMMITTEE Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-05-01 · Published · cited 52× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7834; 2003 WL 2010983
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-08-12 · Published · cited 33× · 648 F.3d 1235; 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1649; 108 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5728; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16806; 2011 WL 3519178
648 F.3d 1235 (2011) State of FLORIDA, by and through ATTORNEY GENERAL, State of South Carolina, by and through Attorney General, State of Nebraska, by and through Attorney General, State of Texas, by and through Attorney General, State of Utah, by and through Attorney General, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Serv