Cases

MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. *558Neil A. Morgan II and Anita L. Graf sued Fairfield County, Ohio, three of its officials, and five members of its sheriff's department under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming Fourth Amendment

SUTTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and in the judgment. I join all of Judge Gibbons’s opinion except for Part IV. Even as to Part IV, I agree with Judge Gibbons that there is no social-worker exception to the Fourth Amendment. And I agree that the social workers are entitled to qualified immunity. I see no need, however, to decide whether these social workers violated the Fourth Am

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. *509Joseph D. Watson filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that law-enforcement officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights by engaging in a warrantless search of the curtilage su

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL No. 21-15907 DIVERSITY; SIERRA CLUB; GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS D.C. No. 3:12-cv- COUNCIL, 08176-SMM Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency, Defendant-Appellee, and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.; SAFARI C

*789 OPINION JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. A February 12, 2014 Indictment charges Defendants with (1) Conspiracy to Manufacture Marijuana, 18 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(mi); and (2) Manufacture of Marijuana, 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(mi), 18 U.S.C. § 2. The charges stem from the evidence obtained in an October 3, 2013 sear

[Cite as State v. Bolen, 2016-Ohio-7821.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-16-01 v. BRIAN P. BOLEN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Seneca County Common Pleas Court Tr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, § § No. 528, 2015 Defendant Below-Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § RALPH ALLAN CEPEC and § C.A. No. N15C-02-184 SANDRA FAYE CEPEC,

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court is the plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 10), to which the government filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 13), the plaintiff filed a Reply (Docket No. 16), and the government filed a Sur-Reply (Docket No. 19). For the reasons stated herein, the Motion for Leave to Amend will be granted, and the pla

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge On November 12, 2015, the Defendant William Scully a/k/a Liam Scully (the “Defendant” or “Scully”) was convicted, after a jury trial, of 66 felony counts with which he was charged pursuant to a 75-count superseding indictment filed on July 22, 2015. Scully now moves under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure' (“Fed. R. Crim. P.” or the “Rule(s)”) 29 for a

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. BROWN, Circuit Judge: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (“the Act”), Pub.L. No. 111-31, 123 Stat. 1776 (2009), directed the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to issue regulations requiring all cigarette packages manufactured or sold i

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 10, 2012 Decided August 24, 2012 No. 11-5332 R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, ET AL., APPELLEES v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with No. 12-5063 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Dist

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

It is the plaintiffs' position that in view of the recitals in the mortgages that "the total principal indebtedness secured by this mortgage shall not exceed the sum of $7,600.00", the mortgages were extinguished when $15,200.00 had been advanced and paid, and that any further advances were unsecured, notwithstanding that in the end a balance of some $5,000.00 was still owing by them to the holder of their notes. The defendants contend that this balance, being within the limitation, was secur

Wait, J. There was evidence that the employee received injuries which resulted in his death through a collision between an automobile which he was driving and a post near the roadway. The automobile belonged to his wife who allowed him to use it; and was being driven by him in bringing from a store of the employer in Winchester to another of the employer’s stores in West Medford two turkeys desired by him, as manager of the West