Cases

571 S.W.2d 551 (1978) UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. Rosemary D. TULL, Appellee. No. 15963. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. September 6, 1978. Rehearing Denied October 18, 1978. Reese L. Harrison, Jr., John H. Tate, II, Oppenheimer, Rosenberg, Kelleher & Wheatley, San Antonio, for appellant. James G. M

Per Curiam. *903 *133 These consolidated appeals involve a wrongful death action filed by Rebecca Goodwin as personal representative of Ezekiel Goodwin's estate (plaintiff). Following a jury tri

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF EZEKIEL D. GOODWIN, by FOR PUBLICATION REBECCA R. GOODWIN, Personal July 3, 2018 Representative, 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff-Appellee, and JEFF GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v No. 333963 Grand Traverse Circuit Court NORTHWEST MICHIGAN FAI

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Brian S. Hooker brings this action against defendants Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and Thomas R. Frieden, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), under the Freedom of Information Act

242 S.W.3d 286 (2006) AON RISK SERVICES, Appellant, v. Linda MICKLES, Appellee. No. CA 05-1397. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. November 1, 2006. Rehearing Denied December 6, 2006. *288 Tony L. Wilcox, P.A., by: Tony L. Wilcox; Orr, Scholtens, Willhite & Averitt, PLC, by: Chris A. Averitt, Jonesboro, for appell

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice. 11Appellant Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc., d/b/a/ CenOk Pipeline, Inc., appeals the grant of summary judgment on its claims against appellees Hawk Field Services, LLC; Petrohawk Operating, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Petrohawk Energy Corporation; Petrohawk Operating Company; Petrohawk Operating Company, LLC; Lee Hallmark; and John Does 1, 2, and

82 Md. App. 45 (1990) 570 A.2d 328 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, TRUSTEE. No. 745, September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 1, 1990. Patrick A. O'Doherty (Amy J. Muffolett, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Robert R. Michael (George W. Shadoan, on the brief), Rockvi

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. This is a consolidated appeal wherein Plaintiff, American Medical Security Inc. (“AMS”), appeals from two separate judgments entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granting summary judgment to Defendant, Auto Club Insurance Association of Michigan (“AAA”), while denying summary judgme

*734 MANION, Circuit Judge. The International Financial Services Corporation (International) finances printing presses. It sued various defendants for breach of a contract to produce a printing press and for fraud. A jury found that defendant Chromas Technologies Canada, Incorporated (Chromas), was the al

356 F.3d 731 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.CHROMAS TECHNOLOGIES CANADA, INC., a Canadian Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, andDidde Corporation, et al., Defendants, Cross-Appellees. No. 02-4079. No. 02-4188. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.-, Damages Caused By Breach Of Contract; Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) 702 (Experts); Remand. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER ON REMAND REGARDING BREACH OF CONTRACT DAMAGES BRADEN, Judge. <

CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER1 KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...596 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .. .597 A. Pre-Trial Proceedings ... 597 B. The Trial ... 600 III. FINDINGS OF FACT ... 601 A. Public Health Issues Associated w

The opinion of the court was delivered by Lockett, J.: Chief Judge Earl E. O’Connor of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas has certified the following question for resolution pursuant to K.S.A. 60-3201: Does K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 60-19a01 violate the Kansas Constitution, including §§ 5 and 18 of the Kansas Bill of Rights? The majority of our legislature voted to limit t

528 U.S. 167 (2000) FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, INC., et al. v. LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TOC), INC. No. 98-822. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 12, 1999. Decided January 12, 2000. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *168 *169

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge HAMILTON and Judge ANDERSON joined. OPINION ERVIN, Circuit Judge: Smithfield Foods, Inc. (“Smithfield”) appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States finding Smith-field liable

191 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.SMITHFIELD FOODS, INCORPORATED; SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; GWALTNEY OF SMITHFIELD, LTD., Defendants-Appellants.MICHIGAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; PENNSYLVANIA CHAMBER OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY; COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY; AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE; AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE; INDEPENDEN

INTERIM REPORT REGARDING S. 794 “A BILL FOR THE RELIEF OF LAND GRANTORS IN HENDERSON, UNION, AND WEBSTER COUNTIES, KENTUCKY, AND THEIR HEIRS” AND MEMORANDUM OPINION BRADEN, Judge. Shortly after the onset of World War II, the United States (“Government”) acquired approximately 35,849.28 acres of land in the counties of Henderson, Union, and Webster, Kentucky to establish an Army training facility, that later

ACCEPTED 13-15-00180-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

*215OPINION OF THE COURT Weiss, J. This appeal focuses on the constitutional validity of the New Car Lemon Law alternative arbitration mechanism implemented by General Business Law § 198-a (k) (see, L 1986, ch 799, § 4, eff Jan. 1, 1987). Plaintiffs, who are trade associations representing automobile manufacturers and importers, commenced thi

LAY, Circuit Judge. On March 5, 1975, a federal magistrate issued a warrant authorizing the search of a retail music store located in Somerville, Massachusetts, known as “D and L Limited”. The warrant authorized the executing officer to seize “certain 8-track electronic tapes and tape cartridges which are unauthorized ‘pirate’ reproductions and also any commercial documentation