Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Tulk v. Marshall University”
In Re Work Uniform Casespublic domain
34 Cal.Rptr.3d 635 (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 328 In re WORK UNIFORM CASES. Salvador Goshorn et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. State of California et al., Defendants and Respondents. [And six other cases.].[*] No. A107130. Court of Appeal, First District, Division One. October 11, 2005. *637
In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.public domain
AMUNDSON, Justice. Technical Information Project (TIP) appeals from a judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Board of Minerals and Environment (Board) to grant a permit to South Dakota Disposal Systems, Inc. (SDDS) for the construction and operation of a municipal solid waste balefill disposal facility. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. FACTS This contr
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 192 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 196 The action is one for the foreclosure of a mortgage given in 1892 by the Steinway Railway Company to a trustee for bondholders. <
Green, Judge: The real question involved in this case is: Should the courts at the instance of the "West Virginia Transportation Company enforce the grants and contracts made with it by E. Lj. Gale and wife dated respectively January 31, 1870, and October 23, 1873 ? These two contracts are identical in lan*612•guage, except that the first applied to lands in Ritchie cou