Cases

62 So.3d 105 (2011) TUBBS RICE DRYERS, INC. d/b/a Tubbs Rice & Grain v. Lawrence MARTIN. No. 2010-C-1105. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 29, 2011. Reconsideration denied.

In re Martin, Lawrence; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 2008-36 CV; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 44,800-CA. Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(a)(d).

44 So.3d 702 (2010) TUBBS RICE DRYERS, INC. d/b/a Tubbs Rice & Grain v. Lawrence MARTIN. No. 2010-C-1105. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 3, 2010. Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(a)(d).

DREW, J. |) Lawrence Martin appeals a judgment denying his exceptions of prematurity, no cause of action, no right of action, and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. FACTS Tubbs Rice Dryers, Inc., operates grain storage facilities in northeast Louisiana. Tubbs books grains from local farmers. The way the booking process works is that farmers contact Tubbs to sell future cro

Reconsideration denied.

PER CURIAM. We sua sponte consolidate these appeals for purposes of ultimate disposition. First, appellant appeals an order finding him in contempt for failure to relinquish possession of the parties’ home in the Bahamas, which home was awarded to appellee as a result of a final judgment of dissolution. In Tubbs v. Tubbs, 648 So.2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), this court reversed the final judgment of dissoluti

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 315 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-24-267 Opinion Delivered May 21, 2025 JUSTIN TUBBS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SECOND DIVISION

[Cite as State v. Tubbs, 2020-Ohio-730.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JERMAINE TUBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

897 So.2d 520 (2005) Timeka TUBBS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 04-1259. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 2, 2005. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Susan Martin, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Angel L. Fleming, Assistant Attorney General, for

257 S.W.3d 47 (2007) Stacy TUBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 06-945. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 10, 2007. *48 James B. Bennett, El Dorado, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Laura Shue, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice. Appellant Stacy Tubbs brings

On Remand from the Supreme Court A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the case remanded. See Ex parte Martin,733 So.2d 392 (Ala. 1999). In compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. JUDGMENT REINSTATED. ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

The four coemployee-liability actions now before us on this certiorari review arose from an explosion at a 3M Corporation chemical plant that killed three employees and injured another. The injured employee and the widows of the three deceased employees sued John Martin, who was the plant manager and thus a coemployee of the victims. First, the plaintiffs claimed, under Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11(c)(1), that Martin had willfully failed to provide a sa

648 So.2d 817 (1995) Jerry TUBBS, Appellant, v. Betty TUBBS, Appellee. No. 93-0654. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 4, 1995. Rehearing and/or Clarification Denied February 10, 1995. Ronald Sales of Law Office of Ronald Sales, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Martin L. Haines, III, of Martin L. Haines, III, C

I do not agree that the plaintiffs proffered substantial evidence that would defeat Martin's motion for a summary judgment. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. Under Alabama law, the knowledge of a potentially dangerous condition in the workplace will not support a co-employee action unless there is evidence that the defendant was substantially certain that injury or death could occur as a result of that condition. See Scott v. Goins, 677 So.2d 1154

16 S.W.3d 127 (2000) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Appellant, v. August GORDON, Alfred Allen and wife, Mary Allen, Eddie Bennett and wife, Rosa Mae Bennett, Eddie J. Billingsley and wife, Arlene Billingsley, Willie J. Bolden and wife, Patricia Bolden, Oscar William Booker, Samuel Boswell and wife, Billie Ruth Boswell, Robert L. Brasfield and wife, Dorothy A. Brasfield, Dennis Brown, Individually and as personal Representative of The Estate of Port

Reconsideration denied.

04/28/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 4, 2020 Session WANDA TUBBS v. JEFF LONG, AS COMMISSIONER OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY1 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 18C2254 Kelvin D. Jones, Judg

68 F.3d 685 Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,677CONSTITUTION BANKv.Steven R. TUBBS, Elliott A. Weinberg and Weinberg Tubbs &Co., Appellants in No. 93-1295, Steven R. Tubbs,Appellant in No. 94-1489, Elliott A.Weinberg, Appellant in No. 94-1411. Nos. 93-1295, 94-1411 and 94-1489. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 5, 1994.Decided

MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT ¶ 1. Mississippi Code Section 99-19-81 1 authorizes the State to seek increased punishment for those charged with a felony offense after having twice been convicted of prior felonies. But for this statutory enhancement to apply, the State must prove each of the defen

CRIST, Judge. Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He seeks to vacate a jury conviction for second degree murder for which he was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison. We affirm. The evidence presented at movant’s trial is set out in detail in our opinion affirming his conviction. State v. Tubbs, 670 S.W.2d 870 (Mo.App.1983). We only repeat those facts