Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan v. High-Light Electric Inc”
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Barry Meyer, Dan Sellers, Richard Ri-zotto (“Employees”), and Southern California IBEW-NECA Trust Funds (“Trusts”),( the administrators of several employee benefit plans associated with unions which represent employees,1 are seeking to collect money owed for work performed on a public construction project using California’s stop notice and payment bond remedies. The distri
247 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2001) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA TRUST FUNDS; BARRY MEYER; DAN SELLERS;RICHARD RIZOTTO, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.STANDARD INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; PHYLLIS M. STROUT, Defendants,andRELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA TRUST FUNDS; BARRY MEYER; DAN SELLERS; RICHARD RIZOTTO, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.STANDARD INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; PHYLLIS M. STROUT; R
(2008) MICHIGAN ELECTRICAL EMPLOEES PENSION FUND, Michigan Electrical Employees Health Plan, National Electrical Benefit Fund, National Electrical Annuity Fund, Lansing Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Trust, and Lansing Labor-Management Cooperation Fund, Plaintiffs, v. ENCOMPASS ELECTRIC & DATA, INC.; Encompass Electric & Telecom, Inc.; James K. Price, Jr., both individually and d/b/a Encompass Electric & Data,
Forsberg v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.public domain
184 P.3d 610 (2008) 2008 UT App 146 Troy FORSBERG, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America; Davis Hospital and Medical Center, Inc.; and Davis Hospital and Medical Center, LP, Defendants and Appellees. No. 20070338-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 24, 2008.
Citizens Business Bank v. Gevorgianpublic domain
*605 Opinion EPSTEIN, P. J. This case involves competing claims of lien priority between the seller of real property, which took back a security interest on property sold to a developer, and the bank which financed development of the project through a construction loan. The issue is w