Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Appellants Mark and Janet Ziegenhagen, First Call Mortgage & Investments, LLC, and G. Jefferson Campbell, Jr., P.C., appeal a decision by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order permitting a compromise agreement between Appellees Chapter 7 Trustee Tracy D. Trunnell and Lee D. Dorsey, trustee of the Dorsey Loving Trust, concerning certain property of the

398 B.R. 321 (2008) In re TOP FLIGHT STAIRS & RAILS, LTD., Debtor. Thomas E. Springer, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Okaw Truss, Inc., Defendant. Nos. 06 B 7975, 08 A 536. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 12, 2008. *322 Arthur W. Rummler, Springer, Brown, Covey, Gaertner & Davis, LLC,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0485 Filed February 11, 2015 KIMBERLY SUSAN ANDERSEN and MICHAEL CURTIS ANDERSEN, Individually and as Next Friends of HANNAH ANDERSEN AND CADEN ANDERSEN, Minors, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. KAMLINE HIGHWAY MARKINGS, L.L.C., and DARRELL LEE HOCKING, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Clarke County Development Corporation (“CCDC”) sued Affinity Gaming, LLC, and its subsidiary, HGI-Lakeside, LLC, (collectively, “Affinity”) to enforce a memorandum of understanding that was signed after a mediation. The district court concluded that no contract existed as a matter of law, because the negotiating parties did not intend the memorandum to

OPINION AND ORDER AFTER TRIAL SCOTT W. DALES, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Marcia R. Meoli, as chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Shawn C. Allen (the “Debtor”), sued the Debtor’s former wife, Tamara Cooper, to avoid and recover specific transfers the Debtor made to Ms. Cooper pursuant to a judgment of divorce (the “JOD”). Ms. Meoli (the “Trustee” or “Plaintiff’)

202 P.3d 871 (2009) 345 Or. 670 In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF G. Jefferson CAMPBELL, Jr., Accused. OSB 06-14, 06-127; SC S055577. Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted December 10, 2008. Decided February 5, 2009. *873 G. Jefferson Campbell, Jr., in propria persona, argued t

ORDER RALPH B. KIRSCHER, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding the Plaintiff, Patricia Trunnels (“Patricia”), seeks an exception to the discharge of the Defendants/Debtors William M. Schmidt (“Bill”) and Gareth G. Schmidt (“Gareth”), in the sum of $714,014.85 for fraud or defalcation under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4). Gareth served as Trustee of the Gagle Family Trust (the “Trust”), a trust est

454 B.R. 6 (2011) In re FINANCIAL RESOURCES MORTGAGE, INC. and C L & M, Inc., and other jointly administered cases, Debtors. Steven M. Notinger, Chapter 7 Trustee for Financial Resources Mortgage, Inc. and C L & M, Inc., Plaintiff v. Philip Migliaccio and Melanie Migliaccio, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 09-14565-JMD, 09-14566-JMD. Adversary No. 10-1075-JMD. United States Bankruptcy Court, D.

276 B.R. 173 (2002) Rosa DIXON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FIRST FAMILY FINANCIAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Civ.A. No. 3:01-CV-137BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. March 15, 2002. *174 *175 *176 Charles E. Gibson, III, Jo

BISTLINE, Justice, dissenting. Thirty-one years ago the Idaho legislature enacted into law a new Chapter. 15 to Title 45, which title has long been captioned: LIENS, MORTGAGES AND PLEDGES. That new chapter to Title 45 is captioned: TRUST DEEDS. The 1957 legislators had the foresight to embody therein their Declaration of Policy, which was to bolster Idaho’s economic growth:

Gilbert, J. 1. “In an action of trover tlie issue is one of title, and not of debt. . . The sole issue in tlie trial of an action of trover is that of title to tlie property in dispute; and the fact that the plaintiff may elect to take a money verdict in lieu of the specific personalty claimed can in no event alter that issue.” Berry v. Jackson, 115 Ga. 196, 197 (41 S. E. 698, 90 Am. St. R. 102). “That

Bell, Justice. On January 17, 1934, Mrs. Birdie O’Callaghan filed in the superior court of Dodge County a suit against the Bank of Eastman to recover sums of money collected by the bank on notes alleged to have been delivered to the bank as security for a debt of her husband. The defendant bank filed a demurrer based upon general grounds and also upon the specific ground that the alleged cause of action was barred by the statute

128 U.S. 236 (1888) BRODNAX v. ÆTNA INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 61. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 1, 1888. Decided November 19, 1888. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. *239 Mr. W.W. Montgomery for appellants.

Appellant, whose lands are embraced within the boundaries of Consolidated School District No. 34, Canyon county, seeks by this action to have the special *Page 225 tax levied against his property by this district for the school year 1920 declared invalid, and to recover, with interest, the sum of $67.57, the amount paid by him under protest as the first instalment. He bases his attack on the legality of the tax on four propositions. He first attacks the l