Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Trujillo v. Pueblo County Detention Center”
Coriz v. Rodriguezpublic domain
It is common practice among district judges in this circuit to make such a statement and adopt the magistrate judges' recommended dispositions when they find that magistrate judges have dealt with the issues fully and accurately and that they could add little of value to that analysis. We cannot interpret the district court's statement as establishing that it failed to perform the required de novo review. In re Griego<
Coriz v. Rodriguezpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, filed May 15, 2018 (Doc. 27)("PF & RD"). On May 29, 2018, both Petitioner Daniel E. Coriz and Respondent Robert B. Coriz filed objections to the PF & RD. See Petitioner Coriz' Objections to Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 27] at 1, file
Loya v. Gutierrezpublic domain
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number:______________ 3 Filing Date: May 11, 2015 4 NO. 34,447 5 JOSE LUIS LOYA, 6 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 GLEN GUTIERREZ, Commissioned 10 Officer of Santa Fe County, 11 12 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant-Petitioner, 13 v. 14 COUNTY OF SANTA FE, 15 Third-Party Defendant/Appellee-Respondent. 16 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI 17 Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge 18 VanAmberg, Rogers, Ye
Loya v. Gutierrezpublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 11:35:51 2015.06.30 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number
Kerns v. Board of Commissionerspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s Judgment, filed January 19, 2012 (Doc. 286-2)(“Tenth Circuit Judgment”); (ii) United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s Opinion, filed January 19, 2012 (Doc. 286-1);1 and (iii) Defendants D
Sisneros v. Fisherpublic domain
685 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2010) Dennis SISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. Michael FISHER, in his individual capacity, and the County of Bernalillo, Defendants. No. CIV 09-0213 JB/ACT. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. January 13, 2010. *1194 Robert R. Cooper, Ryan J. Villa, The Law Offices of Robert R. Cooper, Albuquerque, NM, for Plai
United States v. Edwardspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion In Limine to Prohibit Discussion of Sentencing or Punishment at Trial, filed May 26, 2017 (Doc. 44)(“Motion in Limine”).1 The Court held a hearing regarding this motion, and other similar motions, on June 22, 2017. See Transcr
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss *1219Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment, filed September 24, 2018 (Doc. 72)("Motion"). The primary issues are whether: (i) a Navajo Nation Department of Public Safety ("NDPS") officer, Houston Largo, was a fe
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Antonio Sanchez, filed January 31, 2011 (Doc. 49); (ii) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Robert Valenzuela, filed January 31, 2011 (Doc. 50); (iii) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Richard Trujillo, filed
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Individual DOH Defendants’1 Motion and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Procedural Due Process Claims on the Basis of Qualified Immunity (“Motion to Dismiss Procedural Due Process Claims”), [Doc. 267], the Individual DOH Defendants’ Moti
Skyline Potato Co. v. Tan-O-On Marketing, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Tan-O-On Marketing Inc.’s Motion to Amend Third Party Complaint for Fraud and Theft of Trade Secrets and Unjust Enrichment, filed February 2, 2012 (Doc. 105) (“Motion to Amend”); and (ii) Defendants Hi-Land Potato Company, Inc.’s and Carl Worley’s Motion to Dismiss Fraud and Fraud-Related
Abreu v. NEW MEXICO CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIESpublic domain
797 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2011) Ed ABREU, Joe Bustos, Richard Gonzales, Tom Mascarenas, Marie Matejka, Albert Pino, Antonio Sanchez, Richard Trujillo, and Robert Valenzuela, Plaintiffs, v. NEW MEXICO CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES DEPARTMENT (CYFD), Dorian Dodson, as an individual and in her official capacity as Secretary of CYFD, New Mexico State Personnel Office, and Sandra Perez, as an individual and in her official capacity as State Personnel Office
Ramos v. Lammpublic domain
485 F.Supp. 122 (1979) Fidel RAMOS, David Lee Anderson, Sadiki Lisimba Ajamu (a/k/a Eugene Collins), Alexander Roses, Mark J. Menchetti and Lester Lazenby et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard D. LAMM, Allen L. Ault, John Perko, Edgar Fox and William Wilson, Defendants. No. 77-K-1093. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 20, 1979. As Amended December 26