Cases

Although categorically excluded from the D & O Coverage Section, loss and claims against the insured stemming from employment-related practices are covered under the EPL Coverage Section. Section 2(b) covers only enumerated species of actual or alleged Employment Practices Violations: (i) wrongful dismissal, discharge or termination (either actual or constructive) of employment, including breach of an implied contract;

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. January 8, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Court a

OPINION George B. Daniels, United States District Judge. Plaintiff, the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, brought this action alleging that Defendant First Bankers Trust Services, Inc. (“FBTS”) violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., by approving the sale of 49% of Maran, Inc., a private label denim manufacturer, to the

Case: 17-12802 Date Filed: 11/13/2019 Page: 1 of 70 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-12802 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cv-02753-CEH-AAS CAMBRIDGE C

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Chief Judge. Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), filed this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) on behalf of Claimants Kayla Roberts, Ashley Hopmayer, and Miranda Watson against Defendant, The Finish Line, Inc. (“Finish Line”), claimants’ former employer. Plaintiff a

BRISCOE, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by LUCERO, Circuit Judge. In its eagerness to afford rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to Hobby Lobby and Mardel, the majority ignores the fundamental components upon which sound judicial decisionmaking is grounded: evidence, of

USCA11 Case: 22-11787 Document: 86-1 Date Filed: 01/10/2024 Page: 1 of 49 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11787 ____________________ YOUNG ISRAEL OF TAMPA, INC.,

FAWSETT, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: While I join Parts I, II, and III.B of the majority opinion, I respectfully dissent *1171from Part III.A concerning the hostile work environment sexual harassment claim and those portions of Part III.C which concern the Alabama tort claims of assault

(And Directions to the Clerk of Court) KARLA R. SPAULDING, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motions filed herein: MOTION: CLAIMANT REPUBLIC OF FRANCE MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 75) FILED: September 26, 2017 MOTION: C

FAWSETT, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: While I join Parts I, II, and III.B of the majority opinion, I respectfully dissent from Part III.A concerning the hostile work environment sexual harassment claim and those portions of Part III.C which concern the Alabama tort claims of assault and battery and invasion of privacy.1

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. We took this sex discrimination case en banc in order to reaffirm our circuit law concerning appearance and grooming standards, and to clarify our evolving law of sex stereotyping claims. The plaintiff, Darlene Jespersen, was terminated from her position as a bartender at the sports bar in Harrah’s Reno casino not long after Harrah’s began to enforce its comprehensive uniform, a

MEMORANDUM Hon. John E. Jones, III, District Judge Presently before the Court are the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, and the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Docs. 27, 29. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Plaintiffs’ motion in its entirety and grant Defendants’ motion for Summary Judgment. 1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

511 F.Supp.2d 482 (2007) URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., et al. v. BCBG MAX AZRIA GROUP, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 06-4003. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 18, 2007. *483 *484 Alfred W. Putnam, Jr., Mary E. Kohart, Michael J. Rinaldi, Noah A. Levin, William J. Lehane, Willia

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on two sets of cross-motions for summary judgment. First, Plaintiff Pro-Footbálí, Inc. (“PFI”), Defendants Amanda Black-horse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Phillip Gov-er, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh (“Blackhorse Defendants”), and the United States of America, filed cross-motions for summary judgment on

261 F.Supp.2d 785 (2003) Shaveka GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. THE FINISH LINE, INC. OF DELAWARE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:01CV-153-S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. April 25, 2003. *787 Brian C. Edwards, Louisville, KY, for plaintiff. John O. Sheller, Emily S. Norris, Smith & Smith, Louisvill

598 F.3d 1022 (2010) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. KELLY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Appellee. No. 08-3880. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 21, 2009. Filed: March 25, 2010. *1023 Gail S. Coleman, EEOC, argued, Washington, D.C. (Ronald S. Cooper and Carolyn L

AMAZON.COM, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentAmazon.com, Inc. v. Comm'rDocket No. 31197-12United States Tax Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TWO DJACOLA JEANBAPTISTE, : : C.A. No. K20C-01-021 NEP Plaintiff, : In and for Kent County : v. : : CLARIOS, LLC, :

461 F.Supp.2d 681 (2006) CHICAGO LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW, INC., Plaintiff, v. CRAIGSLIST, INC., Defendants. No. 06 C 0657. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 14, 2006. *682 Louis Albert Crisostomo, Stephen David Libowsky, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, Elyssa B

168 F.Supp.2d 62 (2001) James B. DAIS, Plaintiff, v. LANE BRYANT, INC., Defendant. No. 97 CIV.2011(PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 12, 2001. *63 *64 *65 James B. Dais, Bronx, NY, Pro se. Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, M