Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Troy Selwyn Burden”
Selwyn & Co. v. Wallerpublic domain
Laughlin, J. (dissenting): The plaintiff alleges that on the 6th day of May, 1911, Edward G-. Hemmerde and Francis Neilson, who were the authors of the .play or dramatic composition entitled “ The Butterfly on the Wheel,” and the proprietors of the performing rights thereof for the United States and Canada, made an agreement in writing with Charles Frohman and thereby assigned to him the sole and exclusive right to pro
Ingham County v. Capitol City Lodge No 141 of the Fraternal Order of Police, Labor Program, Incpublic domain
WHITBECK, C.J. This case arose when respondents Ingham County (the county) and Ingham County Sheriff (the sheriff) disciplined Detective Laurie Siegrist, the division president of the charging party, Capitol Lodge No. 141 of the Fraternal Order of Police, Labor Program, Inc. (the union). The county and the sheriff charged that Detective Siegrist violated the sheriffs written work rules when, without prior authorization, she faxed
Atkinson v. Scheerpublic domain
JUSTICE HASSELL delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal of a judgment in a medical negligence action, we consider whether the defendant was entitled to present evidence that *450another doctor, who is not a party to this litigation, breached the standard of care owed to a patient.
The California Institute v. Broadcom Limitedpublic domain
Case: 20-2222 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 02/04/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BROADCOM LIMITED, NKA BROADCOM INC., BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, NKA AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED, APPLE INC., Defendants-Appellants
The California Institute v. Broadcom Limitedpublic domain
Case: 20-2222 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 02/04/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BROADCOM LIMITED, NKA BROADCOM INC., BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, NKA AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED, APPLE INC., Defendants-Appellants
Revis v. Statepublic domain
MAIN, Judge. Christopher (Chris) Dewayne Revis appeals from his convictions of capital murder for the intentional murder of Jerry Stidham1 by shooting him with a .22-cali-ber rifle during the course of committing a first-degree robbery of money and drugs. § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. The jury recommended that Revis be sentenced to death by a vote of 11-1. Following a separate sentencing hearing
Robinson v. Ariyoshipublic domain
441 F.Supp. 559 (1977) Selwyn A. ROBINSON, Eleanor Robinson, Russell S. Robinson, Ruth R. LeFiell, Marion R. Keat, Jean R. Weir, Selwyn A. Robinson, Eleanor Robinson, Bruce B. Robinson, Trustees under the Will of Aylmer F. Robinson, Helen M. Robinson, Individually and as Executrix, Estate of Lester B. Robinson, Bruce B. Robinson and Keith P. Robinson, Plaintiffs, v. George R. ARIYOSHI, Acting Governor, George T. H. Pai, Attorney General, Andrew S
Bynum v. Goldpublic domain
McCLELLAN, J. — “Not guilty” is the plea which presents the genei’al issue in ejectment and in the statutory substitute for that action The only cases to which this plea is-made appropriate by section 2675 of the Code are actions for defamation or for injuries to the person, or to real or personal property. That section does not, therefore, apply to actions of ejectment or the statutory action for the recovery of land, a fact whi
Sullivan v. Louisville & Nashville Railroadpublic domain
TYSON, J. This suit was brought by Martin H. Sullivan in the relation of surviving partner of a partnership alleged to have existed between himself and D. F. Sullivan, deceased. From the complaint it appears that on the 27th of February, 1880, the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. entered into a contract in writing with D. F. Sullivan by which it agreed ito transport for him and liis “assigns” timber and lumber over the Pen
State of Texas v. Harris County, Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE