Cases

215 Mich. App. 612 (1996) 546 N.W.2d 702 CITY OF BRONSON v. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY Docket No. 175170. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted December 12, 1995, at Grand Rapids. Decided February 27, 1996, at 9:20 A.M. Warner Norcross & Judd LLP (by Robert J. Jonker and Elizabeth M. Topliffe),

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00061-CR NO. 09-20-00062-CR __________________ TROY WAYNE HARMON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _____

81 Mich. App. 585 (1978) 265 N.W.2d 759 CITY OF TROY v. TROY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Docket No. 30704. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 6, 1978. Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg (by Paul H. Townsend, Jr., Ronald J. Santo, and Seth M. Lloyd), for the City of Troy. John A. Lyons, for defe

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0180p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ESTATE OF SETH MICHAEL ZAKORA; BRANDY ZAKORA, │ in her capacity as

WALLIS, J. Dr. Sualeh Kamal Ashraf (“DrAshraf’) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint for defamation against Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., d/b/a Florida Hospital Apopka (“Appellee”). We agree that the two-year statute of limitations under the single publication rule bars Dr. Ashrafs claim. We affirm in all respects and certify a question of great public imp

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-KA-01005-SCT SHANNON TROY DEROUEN a/k/a TROY DEROUEN v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 5/2/2007 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: BRENDA JACKSON PATTERSON GLENN S. SWARTZFAGER ATTORNEY FOR

Bronson, J. Plaintiff appeals as of right from the circuit court’s order upholding the validity of defendant’s single-family zoning classification of property owned by plaintiff. We find that plaintiff met its burden of proving that the zoning classification of plaintiff’s property does not reasonably advance any governmental interest and is therefore invalid. We accordingly reverse the judgment of the trial court.

John T. Gregg, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss and brief in support thereof [Adv. Dkt. No. 36] (the "Motion") filed by Local Exchange Carriers of Michigan, Inc., one of the defendants in the above-captioned adversary proceeding ("LEC-MI").2 LEC-MI argues that the Complaint fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted under Fed. R. Bankr.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-EC-00899-SCT JOHN A. (PAP) MOORE v. STACEY W. PARKER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/09/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES T. KITCHENS, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CHICKASAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: SAMUEL L. BEGLEY

Bronson, J. Plaintiff, Carl Campbell, was employed by defendant, City of Troy, as its Superintendent of Public Works from June 15, 1959, until his mandatory retirement on December 31, 1967. Plaintiff received an annual salary for his services. The demands of the job required him to work *536overtime on numerous occasions. Plaintiff received no payment for this overtime w

39 Mich. App. 219 (1972) 197 N.W.2d 496 HAVEN v. CITY OF TROY Docket No. 10550. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 22, 1972. Rehearing denied May 4, 1972. *221 Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by Norman Hyman), for plaintiffs. Burke & Sawyer, for

109 Mich. App. 361 (1981) 311 N.W.2d 782 CITY OF TROY v. CLEVELAND PNEUMATIC TOOL COMPANY. Docket No. 50920. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 10, 1981. William S. Wolanin, City Attorney, for petitioner. Cook & Pringle, P.C. (by Alexander J. Lelli, Jr.), for respondent. Before: M.J. KELLY, P.J

27 Mich. App. 123 (1970) 183 N.W.2d 430 CITY OF TROY v. HERSHBERGER Docket Nos. 6980 and 7865. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 2, 1970. Leave to appeal denied February 11, 1971. Burke & Sawyer, for appellees. Gerald R. Hershberger, for appellants. Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and BRONSON

28 Mich. App. 24 (1970) 184 N.W.2d 340 POWERS v. CITY OF TROY Docket No. 6,242. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided November 27, 1970. Cicinelli, Mossner, Majoros, Harrigan & Alexander, for plaintiffs. Patterson & Patterson, Barrett, Whitfield, Manikoff & White (Robert G. Waddell, of counsel), for defend

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Washington County (Pritzker, J.), entered November 4, 2013, which, among other things, partially granted petitioner’s application, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are th

Jensen, Justice. [¶ 1] Dr. Troy Pierce and the Bone & Joint Center ("Petitioners") petition for a supervisory writ following the district court's denial of their motion to dismiss. We grant the Petitioners' request for a supervisory writ and direct the district court to enter a judgment dismissing Robert Carvell's complaint against the Petitioners. I

PAUL D. BORMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case involves various parties' claims for the payment of no-fault insurance benefits stemming from an August 19, 2014 motor vehicle accident in which a car driven by Tamika R. Burrell, the original Plaintiff in this action, was struck in the rear by a hit and run driver and sustained *664acciden

Opinion DALY, J. The petitioner, Troy Mozell, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he sought to vacate his conviction of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b)1 and conspiracy to possess narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a)

Opinion BISHOP, J. The defendant, Troy Artis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of accessory to assault in the first degree by means of a dangerous instrument in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-8 and 53a-59 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied his postverdict motion for a judgment of acquittal on the ground of ins

Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Powers, J.), entered April 1, 2009, which, among other things, dismissed respondent’s application, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of two daughters born in 1997 and 2001, and have been