⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tribble v. Surface Preparation Systems Inc.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2005-02-10 · Published · cited 50× · 154 S.W.3d 639; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1044; 2004 WL 2400983
PLURALITY OPINION CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice. In this breach of contract case, Tribble & Stephens Company (“T & S”) appeals a summary judgment in favor of RGM Constructors, L.P. (“RGM”)1 on the grounds that: (1) RGM failed to comply with a contractual condition precedent to litigation; (2) there were disputed fact issues concerning RGM’s performance under the
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2004-10-28 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded; Plurality and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed October 28, 2004 Reversed and Remanded; Plurality and Concurring and Dissenting Opinions filed October 28, 2004.
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006-01-13 · Published · cited 2× · 455 F. Supp. 2d 608; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3755; 2006 WL 89838
455 F.Supp.2d 608 (2006) KOTHMANN ENTERPRISES, INC., successor by merger to Kothmann and Kothmann, Inc., Plaintiff, v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. II-01-2668. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 13, 2006. *609 *610
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018-10-31 · Published · cited 1× · 595 B.R. 524
Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Montco Oilfield Contractors, LLC filed its Second Amended Complaint alleging misrepresentation, breach of contract, and quantum meruit claims against Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC and JX Nippon Oil Exploration (U.S.A.) Limited. The Complaint alleges that Montco is entitled to recover unpaid amounts owed to Montco for performing plugging and abandonment services, dama
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968-10-22 · Published · cited 10× · 291 F. Supp. 368; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10141
291 F.Supp. 368 (1968) Mrs. Jewell SCHENEBECK and Russell Schenebeck, Plaintiffs, v. STERLING DRUG, INC., Defendant. No. LR-66-C-248. United States District Court E. D. Arkansas, W. D. October 22, 1968. *369 Henry Woods, of McMath, Leatherman, Woods & Youngdahl, Little Rock, Ark., Thomas C. Hullverson, of Hullverson, Richards
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016-01-22 · Published · cited 1× · 550 B.R. 422; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2148
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION IN LIMINE Robert E. Grant, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court On January 22,2016. The plaintiff has filed a motion in limine, asking the court to preclude the defendant from offering into evidence exhibits and from calling three witnesses it has included on the parties’ joint pretrial order. Although the federal rules do not explicitly au
Malloy v. Reyespublic domain
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014-07-22 · Published · cited 31× · 61 V.I. 163; 2014 WL 3697332; 2014 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 38
OPINION OF THE COURT (July 22, 2014) CABRET, Associate Justice. Lori Gilmore Malloy appeals a Superior Court judgment holding that an unpaved trail providing access to her property on St. John is no longer a public right-of-way. We reverse because the Superior Court erred in concluding that the trail was abandoned and that, as a result, the trail lost its public status. Furthermore, w
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012-06-28 · Published · cited 7× · 876 F. Supp. 2d 802; 2012 WL 2505741; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90284
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ post-trial motions. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court: DENIES Samsung’s Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law that: (1) Samsung Does Not Infringe Any Claim of the Patents-in-Suit; (2) the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suit are Invalid; (3) Samsung is No
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-12-23 · Published · cited 331× · 590 F.3d 31; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28250; 2009 WL 4936397
590 F.3d 31 (2009) Ángel Luis SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Miguel A. PEREIRA-CASTILLO, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 08-1748. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 6, 2009. Decided December 23, 2009. *36 Guillermo Ramos-Luiña, for appellant. Rosa E. Pérez-Agosto, with whom Ma
California Court of Appeal · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/7/15 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A137121 v. JOSE VEGA-ROBLES, (Contra Costa County
California Court of Appeal · 2015-05-05 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/5/15 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A137121 v. JOSE VEGA-ROBLES, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 05-080176-1)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-09-11 · Published · cited 28× · 975 F.3d 1016
Case: 20-12003 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 200 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-12003 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 4:19-cv-00300-RH-MJF; 4:19-cv-00304-RH-MAF KELVIN LEON JONES, ROSEMARY MCCOY,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 20-12003 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 200 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-12003 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 4:19-cv-00300-RH-MJF; 4:19-cv-00304-RH-MAF KELVIN LEON JONES, ROSEMARY MCCOY,
Bland v. Hillpublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999-04-22 · Published · cited 29× · 735 So. 2d 414; 1999 WL 233856
735 So.2d 414 (1999) Alvin E. BLAND v. Charles W. HILL. No. 97-CA-00970-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 22, 1999. *415 Janet McMurtray, Fred Krutz, III, Jackson, James Hugh Ray, Tupelo, Michael D. Simmons, Jackson, Attorneys for Appellant. Michael J. Malouf, Charles Eric Malouf, Michael James Malouf, Jr., Jackson,
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-03-21 · Published · cited 102× · 402 F.3d 175; 2005 WL 638158
402 F.3d 175 UNITED STATES of Americav.Paul G. SCZUBELEK, Appellant. No. 03-2173. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued February 12, 2004. Decided March 21, 2005. Eleni Kousoulis (Argued), Office of Federal Public Defender, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.
Aponte v. Calderonpublic domain
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001-11-29 · Published · cited 2× · 176 F. Supp. 2d 135; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20190; 2001 WL 1561724
176 F.Supp.2d 135 (2001) Jorge E. APONTE and his wife; Daniel Pagan, his wife, and the conjugal partnership constituted between them, Plaintiffs, v. Sila M. CALDERON, in her personal and official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, her husband, Adolfo Krans, and the conjugal partnership constituted between them; David Noriega-Rodriguez, in his personal and official capacity as President of the Independent Citizens' Commission to Evaluate Governm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-10-29 · Published · cited 42× · 270 F.3d 356
OPINION DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. Defendants John White and Carolyn Taylor, employees of the Ohio County (Kentucky) Water District, were convicted of making materially false statements regarding a matter within the jurisdiction of the federal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1994), by submitting reports containing falsified turbidity measuremen
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-00970-SCT ALVIN E. BLAND v. CHARLES W. HILL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/04/1997 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BARRY W. FORD COURT FROM WHICH LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPEALED: ATTORNEYS FOR JANET MCMURTRAY APPELLANT: FRED KRUTZ, III JAMES HUGH RAY MICH
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1984-04-10 · Published · cited 2× · 585 F. Supp. 1481; 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 210; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17749
585 F.Supp. 1481 (1984) The STANDARD OIL COMPANY v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 80-1325. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 10, 1984. *1482 Robert E. Leake, Jr., Hammett, Leake, Hammett, New Orleans, La., for Standard Oil Co.; Rufus S. Day, Jr., Eben G. Crawford, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, and John
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985-09-10 · Published · cited 18× · 476 So. 2d 696; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2102
476 So.2d 696 (1985) CEDARS OF LEBANON HOSPITAL CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. Orlando SILVA, M.D., et al., Appellees. Ruben GURVICH, M.D., et al., Appellants, v. Orlando SILVA, M.D., et al., Appellees. Orlando SILVA, M.D., As Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria Teresa Silva, Deceased, Appellant, v. CEDARS OF LEBANON HOSPITAL CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees. Nos.