Cases

*1052 DYK, Circuit Judge. AngioScore, Inc. (“AngioScore”) claims exclusive ownership of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,080,026 (“the '026 patent”), 8,454,636 (“the '636 patent”), and 8,721,667 (“the '667 patent”) (collectively, “the AngioScore patents”). TriReme Medical, LLC (“TriReme”), claiming to have received

Hughes, Circuit Judge. AngioScore, Inc. sued the defendant-appellants (TriReme 'Medical, LLC, Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd., QT Vascular Ltd., and Eitan Konstantino) for patent infringement, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting, and unfair competition. After separate trials on the patent and state-law claims, the district court entered final judgment for Defendants on the patent claim, for AngioScore on the state-law clai

ORDER Per Curiam. A petition for rehearing was filed by appellee AngioScore, Inc. and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by appellants Eitan Konstantino, QT Vascular Ltd., Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd., and TriReme Medical, LLC. It Is Ordered That: (1) AngioScore’s petition is granted-in-part by the panel. (2)

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims in Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss certain claims in the Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 244 (“4AC”) of plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. (“AngioScore”) pursuant to Federal R

Order on Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss State Law Claims; Motions for Summary Judgment on State Law Claims; Motions in Limine re State Law Experts YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge Now before the Court are three categories of motions: (1) defendants’ motion to dismiss the state law claims in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on s

Ordek ConstruiNG Claims in Dispute; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE INTRODUCTION At the heart of this patent action is an angioplasty device named “Chocolate.” *1280Defendant Eitan Konstanti

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EITAN KONSTANTINO, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim ) Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9681-CB ) ANGIOSCORE, INC., )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EITAN KONSTANTINO, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim ) Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9681-CB ) ANGIOSCORE, INC., ) ) Defe

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Speedfit LLC (“Speed-fit”) and Aurel A. Astilean (“Astilean”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) commenced this action against Woodway USA, Inc. (“Woodway” or “defendant”), alleging that Woodway wrongfully infringed upon United States Patent No. 8,308,619 (“the ’619 Patent”) and United States Patent No. 8,343,016 (“the ’016 Patent”), both o

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERDEFENDANT OBESITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS (ECF No. 43) Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge On March 16, 2015, Obesity Research Institute, LLC (“Obesity Research”) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Fiber Research International, LLC (“Fiber

Taranto, Circuit Judge. In this action against j2 Cloud Services, LLC and Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc. (AMT), Gregory James asserts a claim for correction of inventorship under 35 U.S.C. § 256 , as well as various state-law claims. The district court

Filed 6/16/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO KIM LEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, A157657 v. LUXOTTICA RETAIL NORTH (San Francisco County AMERICA, INC., et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC17562793) Defendants and Respondents.

Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge The Bare Board Group, which distributes printed circuit boards, seeks to recover $ 3.1 million in lost profits from two former directors (Tom Coghlan and Bonnie del Grosso), as well as a competing printed circuit board distributor they helped set up. Bare Board contends Coghlan and del Grosso caused the lost profits

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Joan B. Gottsehall, United States District Judge The plaintiffs are current or former employees of Midwest Wine and Spirits, Inc. (“MWW”), a liquor wholesaler. The defendants in this putative class action lawsuit are MWW, Haus Wine and Spirits, Inc. (MWW’s alleged successor), two entities that are allegedly intertwined with MWW and Haus (Direct Mail Resources, Inc. and