Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Travis W Young and Kara M Young”
ACCEPTED 04-014-00494-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/30/2015 4:41:33 PM
ACCEPTED 04-014-00494-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/19/2
Allen v. Red Frog Events, LLCpublic domain
JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 93) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge recommends that this case be remanded because complete diversity does not exist between the parties due to Plaintiffs' inclusion of the Parish
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs bring challenges to certain zoning and environmental ordinances enacted by Defendant Village of Pomona (the “Village”), alleging they are unlawful under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Aet of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
Arizona for Abortion Access v. Montenegropublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ARIZONA FOR ABORTION ACCESS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. STEVE MONTENEGRO, ET AL.,* Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-24-0167-AP/EL Filed April 3, 2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable C
State of Tennessee v. Robert E. Husepublic domain
03/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 10, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT E. HUSE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. 2013-CR-229 Larry J. Wallace, Judge __________
State of Tennessee v. Robert E. Husepublic domain
03/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 10, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT E. HUSE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. 2013-CR-229 Larry J. Wallace, Judge __________
State v. Robert Daris Spencerpublic domain
2022 WI 56 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP942-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, v. Robert Daris Spencer, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Suarez v. Williamspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Michele Pirro Bailey, J. Petitioners, Ricardo and Laura Suarez (hereinafter grandparents), filed a petition on June 20, 2012 against their son, Ernesto Suarez (hereinafter father), and Melissa Williams (hereinafter mother) seeking custody of their grandchild (DOB: xx/xx/2002). The respondents were served with the petition, appeared with counsel and entered denials. The child was as
Dawkins v. Williamspublic domain
413 F.Supp.2d 161 (2006) Rayon DAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. Roger A. WILLIAMS, Shield # 3844; John Dolan, Investigator; Mike Studant,[1] State Police Investigator, Defendants. No. 1:04 CV 0398 LEK/GHL. United States District Court, N.D. New York. February 7, 2006. *162 *163 Rayon Dawkins,
Bronx Household of Faith v. BOARD OF EDUC., NYpublic domain
Concurring opinions by Judges CALABRESI and LEVAL, as well as a dissenting opinion by Judge WALKER, follow. PER CURIAM: The Bronx Household of Faith, a Christian church, has applied to use New York City school facilities for Sunday worship services. In 2001, the Board of Education of the City of New York denied Bronx Household’s application, relying on Standard Operating Procedure Manual (SOP) § 5.11, its
United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.public domain
513 U.S. 64 (1994) UNITED STATES v. X-CITEMENT VIDEO, INC., et al. No. 93-723. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 5, 1994. Decided November 29, 1994. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *66 Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stevens, O'Connor
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NORMAN W. BLACK, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Koenig’s motion to compel Defendant Arthur Young (“AY”) to produce its “Special Review” binders containing the material resulting from AY’s employment by ISC’s1 Special Audit Committee2 to assist that committee in the investigation of questionable foreign payments.
Wisconsin v. Mitchellpublic domain
508 U.S. 476 (1993) WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL No. 92-515. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 21, 1993. Decided June 11, 1993. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN *477 Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, argued the
Vasquez v. Bradshawpublic domain
522 F.Supp.2d 900 (2007) Robert S. VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:05 CV 1684. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. October 3, 2007. *901 *902 *903 Gordon S. Friedman, Andrea L. Whitaker, Friedman &
Petro Mex, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-1024C Filed: February 20, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETRO MEX, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * v. * * UNITED STATES,