Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Travis D Cleghorn”
Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co. v. Schererpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 727 OPINION The question presented by this appeal is whether the surety on a bond securing the original administrator of an estate is liable *Page 728 for attorney's fees incurred by a successor administrator in a suit against the
Quaresma v. BC LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANYpublic domain
(2007) MARIA QUARESMA, an individual and Successor in Interest of LEONEL DAROSA, a deceased individual, and MARSHAL S. FLAM, M.D., an individual, Plaintiffs, v. BC LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV-F-07-323 OWW/NEW. United States District Court, E.D. California. October 26, 2007. MEMORAN
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS 2, 3, AND 4 ROBERT J. FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding, the chapter 7 trustee of a company that operated a Ponzi scheme seeks to recover money transferred to the defendants. The plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment on December 9, 2011. Numerous defendants opposed the motion.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS BOERNE TO BERGHEIM COALITION § FOR CLEAN ENVIRONMENT, § No. 08-20-00035-CV Appellant, § Appeal from t
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00097-CV Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant v. Nancy Scherer, Successor Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly Lynn Lambert, Deceased, Appellee FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. 69,706-A, HONORABLE GUY S. HERM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00097-CV Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant v.
TCA Building Co. v. Entech, Inc.public domain
86 S.W.3d 667 (2002) TCA BUILDING COMPANY, Appellant, v. ENTECH, INC.; C.G. Embry; and Northwestern Resources Company, Appellees. No. 03-00-00257-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. March 28, 2002. *668 Ben J. Cunningham, R. James George, Jr., Scott Polikov, George, Donaldson & Ford, L.L.P., Austin, for appellant. C
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00257-CV TCA Building Company, Appellant v. Entech,
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 444444444444444 NO. 03-00-00257-CV 444444444444444 TCA Building Company, Appellant v. Entech, Inc.; C. G. Embry; and Northwestern Resources Company, Appellees 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 FROM THE
Christian v. Graypublic domain
65 P.3d 591 (2003) 2003 OK 10 Dwain Lee CHRISTIAN, III, individually and as parent and next friend of Malorie Christian and Michah Christian, minors, Petitioners, v. Karl GRAY, Judge of the District Court of Oklahoma County, Respondent, and Mid-South Abatement Company, Inc., Lippert Bros., Inc., State Fair of Oklahoma, Inc., and the City of Oklahoma City, Real Parties In Interest. No. 96,813.
Salt Flat Water Co. v. Statepublic domain
This appeal by Salt Flat Water Company, a corporation, is from is judgment overruling its plea of privilege to be sued in Harris County where it maintains its principal office and place of business. The suit was filed by the State against appellant, the Allied Oil Company, and L. D. Ormsby. Allied Oil Company is an assumed name adopted by J. B. Stroburg and others, under the provisions of Art. 5924, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. Its designated place of business is Travis County. The pet
Escondido Resources II, LLC v. Justapor Ranch, L.C.public domain
ACCEPTED 04-14-00905-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Evans v. Spurginpublic domain
SAMUELS, J. These two cases being, substantially, between the same parties, in regard to the same property, and depending upon the same facts, were heard together in this court. Many of the facts are set forth in the case of Evans & wife v. Spurgin, 6 Graft. 107. The judgment in that case determined that the better right at law was in the demandants. After the judgment the tenant Spurgin and others, the heirs at law of Lantz