Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TRANSPORT UNLIMITED INC., : No. 131 WAL 2018 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

OPINION AND ORDER ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge: Introduction This post-judgment matter involves two parties and the interests of their respective insurers: plaintiff, Angela Powell (“Powell”); Powell’s Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) coverage provider, Allstate, Inc. (“Allstate”); defendant, System Transport, Inc. (“System Transport”); and System Transport’s mo

Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code § 65.37.Affirmed.

PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

188 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2002) ORGULF TRANSPORT CO., Plaintiff, v. HILL'S MARINE ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Company and Ohio Power Company, Third-Party Defendants. No. 01-CV-4159-JPG. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. January 8, 2002. *1057

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Arizona Electric Power Cooperative (AEPCO) seeks review of a decision of the Surface Transportation Board (STB or Board) dismissing AEPCO’s challenge to the joint rate charged by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) and the Union Pacific Railroad *165(UP) (collectively Railroads) to transport coal from min

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case returns to us for disposition from the Supreme Court of Florida, to which we certified four questions of Florida state law. See National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Rountree Transp. & Rigging, Inc., 286 F.3d 1233, 1258, 1269 (11th Cir.2002). Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s responses to the certified ques

264 B.R. 533 (2001) In re CHILES POWER SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., dba Heatway Systems, Debtor. No. 00-60251. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. June 14, 2001. *534 *535 Teresa A. Generous, Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, St. Louis, MO, for Debtor. E. Joseph O'Neil, Robert A. McCall, Pea

DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge. Niagara. Mohawk Power Company (“NMPC”), having paid environmental costs for cleaning up the industrial peninsula and harbor at Utica Terminal, brought claims for contribution against (inter alia) Mohawk Valley Oil (“MVO”) pursuant to the New York Navigation Law § 181 and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601, et seq. (“CERC

MEMORANDUM *** This litigation arises from the Bonneville Power. Administration’s (“BPA’s”) treatment of refunds owed to one class of customers following our opinions in Portland General Electric Co. v. BPA (PGE), 501 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir.2007), and Golden Northwest Aluminum, Inc. v. BPA (Golden Northwest), 501 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2007). Following those decisions, BPA issued the Record of Dec

HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge On January 6, 2014, Captain Daniel Yates was navigating the Motor Tug Ellen S. Bouchard (the "Tug") and Barge B. No. 280 (the "Barge"), owned by Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc., and B. No. 280 Corp (collectively, "Bouchard" or "Defendant"), in Long Island Sound. He decided to anchor in Hempstead Harbor, but Yates misread the navigation chart and negligently ordered the Barge t

919 F.Supp. 321 (1996) AIR FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., and Jeffrey Schiff, Plaintiffs, v. AIR CARGO TRANSPORT, INC., Pau Pau, Inc., Harold Hamby, William Moultrie, and Airgroup Corporation, Defendants. No. 95 C 5850. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 26, 1996. *322 Marc J. Blumenthal, Buffalo Grove,

413 N.W.2d 598 (1987) Walter KNUTSON, Relator, v. DJM TRANSPORT, INC., Commissioner of Jobs and Training, Respondents. No. C0-87-1057. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. October 13, 1987. *599 Walter Knutson, pro se. Thomas C. Power, Minneapolis, for DJM Transport, Inc. Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Peter C. Andr

OPINION SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff M/G Transport Services, Inc. (“M/G”), appeals the grant of summary judgment to Defendant Water Quality Insurance Syndicate (“WQIS”), and the denial of summary judgment to M/G, in this action seeking a declaration that WQIS breached its duty under a marine insurance policy to defend and indemnify M/G in a

Scaletta v Michels Power, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 00258) Scaletta v Michels Power, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Egan Jr., J.P. Published by New

36 So.3d 1113 (2010) Carol POWERS v. ACE TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al. No. 10-365. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 5, 2010. *1114 Mark T. Garber, Attorney at Law, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Carol Powers. Bryan D. Scofield, Scofield & Rivera, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees,

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, James Perkins, appeals from the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of Defendants, American Electric Power Fuel Supply, Inc. (“AEP”) and Indiana Michigan Power Company, Inc., River Transportation Division,1 after a bench trial on Plaintiffs claims for negligence under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, and unseaworthiness

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0307p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LOU’S TRANSPORT, INC.; T.K.M.S., INC., ┐ Petitioners/Cross-Respondents, │ │

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from the district court’s final judgment resolving a series of cases that were filed after a passenger train of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), as it moved on the railroad track of CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”), collided with a hauler rig owned by Rountree Transport and Rigging, Inc. (“Rountree”). The

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 15, 2022 Decided August 1, 2023 No. 22-1071 SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, PETITIONER v. KC TRANSPORT, INC. AND FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS On Petition for Review of a Decision of the