Cases

Moore, Circuit Judge. *1087 Trading Technologies International, Inc., ("TT") is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,533,056, 7,212,999, and 7,904,374. Each patent relates generally to a graphical user interface ("GUI") for electronic trading. The '056 and '999 patents, which share a specifi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Kelly, Judge: *1297Before the court are several motions for judgment on the agency record challenging various aspects of the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Commerce" or "the Department") determination in the third administrative review of the antidumping duty ("ADD") order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic products, whether or not assem

Moore, Circuit Judge. *1381 Trading Technologies International, Inc., ("TT") appeals a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board holding claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 7,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Clevenger, Circuit Judge. *1351 Swagway, LLC appeals the Final Determination of the International Trade Commission ("the Commission"), which found that Swagway violated 19 U.S.C. § 1

Clevenger, Circuit Judge. This appeal was previously decided by our opinion dated May 9, 2019. Swagway, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n , 923 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2019). Intervenors, Segway, Inc., DEKA Products Ltd. Partnership, and Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Segway") thereafter filed a co

Slip Op. 25-59 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 23-00222 Court No. 23-00227 CANADIAN SOLAR TRINA SOLAR SCIENCE & INTERNATIONAL LIMITED TECHNOLOGY (THAILAND) and CANADIAN SOLAR LTD., MANUFACTURING Plaintiff, (THAILAND) CO., LTD., and Plaintiffs,

Slip Op. 25-13 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge v. Court No. 17-00256 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denies Defe

Slip Op. 20-134 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CANADIAN SOLAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ET AL., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and SHANGHAI BYD CO., LTD. ET AL., Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Plaintiff-Intervenors and Consol. Court No. 17-00173 Consolidated Plaintiff- Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and SOLARWORL

Slip Op. 19-152 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CANADIAN SOLAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ET AL., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and SHANGHAI BYD CO., LTD. ET AL., Plaintiff-Intervenors and Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenors, Consol. Court No. 17-00173 v. UNITED STATES, De

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0213p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GEOMATRIX, LLC, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

Slip Op 19 - 85 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KENT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge v. Court No. 15-00135 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION and ORDER [Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment denied; Defendant’s motion for pa

OPINION Musgrave, Senior Judge: Sensient Technologies Corp., a U.S. producer of allura red coloring, 1 brings this action challenging the negative preliminary determination by the International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “the Commission”) in its antidumping and counter

Opinion Musgrave, Judge: This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to CIT Rule 56. At issue is whether Defendant, the United States Customs Service (“Customs”), was correct in denying duty-free treatment to certain entries of aircraft engine parts by Pratt & Whitney, a division of Plaintiff, United

JUDGMENT Musgrave, Senior Judge: Upon review of Silicon Metal From Brazil: Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Dec. 15, 2003) CRemand Results”) and consideration of the comments submitted by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, as the Remand Results are consistent with the Federal Circuit’s decision, American Silicon

ORDER MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge: In view of the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, American Silicon Technologies v. United States, 334 F.3d 1033 (Fed. Cir. 2003), it is hereby ORDERED that, the Department of Commerce’s Remand Results are remanded again for a determination consistent with the appellate decision; and it is further