Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Traci Smith”
Smith v. Rodriguezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellants, Michele L. Smith and Shannon Douglas Smith, appeal an order dismissing with prejudice their claims against Appellees, Tracie Maler and J'Makaa Corporation. Appellants argue, inter alia , that the non-reliance provision in their real estate purchase contract does not bar their claims for fraud and violations of chapter 475. We agree and reverse as to Appellants' fraud and chapter 475 claims. We otherw
Smith v. Rodriguezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellants, Michele L. Smith and Shannon Douglas Smith, appeal an order dismissing with prejudice their claims against Appellees, Tracie Maler and J'Makaa Corporation. Appellants argue, inter alia , that the non-reliance provision in their real estate purchase contract does not bar their claims for fraud and violations of chapter 475. We agree and reverse as to Appellants' fraud and chapter 475 claims. We otherw
Commonwealth v. Smithpublic domain
PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Petition for Release of Notes of Testimony and All Related Documents are DENIED.
SMITH v. the STATE.public domain
Gobeil, Judge. *384 *643 Following a jury trial, Wilbert Leon Smith was convicted of criminal attempt to commit rape, false imprisonment, and simple battery, and was sentenced to 40 years, 10 of
Smith v. Statepublic domain
GRANT, Justice. A Clayton County jury found appellant Dale El Smith guilty of felony murder and two counts of cruelty to a person age 65 or older in connection with the death of Arthur Pelham. On appeal, Smith argues that there was insufficient evidence to support her convictions and that she received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Neither contention has merit, and we affirm.1
SMITH v. the STATE.public domain
Reese, Judge. Tammy Terrell Smith appeals from a judgment of conviction on a charge of possession of drug related objects. 1 She contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth infra, we vacate the trial court's judgment and remand this case to the trial court with direction. </
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. ZAHLpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. ZAHL Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case
State v. Smithpublic domain
PER CURIAM: . BACKGROUND ' 1 Tracy Eugene Smith was charged with first-degree murder in 1988. That charge included capital punishment as a possible sentence. Mr. Smith pled guilty in exchange for the State's agreement not to seek the death penalty. ' He later filed a motion to withdraw his plea. 1 The distr
Cage v. Smith (In re Smith)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING: (1) GREEN BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO BE JOINED AS A PARTY IN THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S TURNOVER ADVERSARY PROCEEDING; AND (2) GREEN BANK, N.A.’S SUPPLEMENT AND AMENDMENT TO ITS MOTION TO BE JOINED AS A PARTY IN THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S TURNOVER ADVERSARY PROCEEDING [Adv. Docs. No. 5 & 15] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction
Cage v. Smith (In re Smith)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. The Court writes this Memorandum Opinion because it concerns an important *840homestead issue: whether the Fifth Circuit’s recent holding in the Chapter 13 case of Viegelahn v. Frost (In re Frost), <
Smith v. Statepublic domain
BARNES, Presiding Judge. Roy Mandell Smith was convicted of three counts of aggravated assault, one count of burglary, and several firearms charges. He contends on appeal that the evidence was insufficient and that his trial counsel was ineffective for not interviewing all of the State’s witnesses and not objecting to the admission of cell phone records on relevance grounds. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Smithpublic domain
246 P.3d 1090 (2011) 2011 OK 8 STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Tracy SMITH, a.k.a. Tracy Smith Zahl, Respondent. SCBD No. 5615. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. January 31, 2011. *1092 Loraine Dillinder Farabow, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, for the Comp
262 B.R. 594 (2001) In re Tracy SMITH, Debtor. Tracy Smith, Plaintiff, v. Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-85501-478. Adversary No. 801-8084-478. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. May 21, 2001. *595 Reno & Artura, by Richard F. Artura, Lindenhurst, NY, for Tracy S
State v. Smithpublic domain
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of December 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of December 2008."
Smith v. Finchpublic domain
HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice. We granted certiorari to examine the propriety of the so-called “hindsight” jury instruction prescribed for use in medical malpractice actions at Section 62.311 of the Georgia Suggested Pattern Jury Instructions: Civil Cases. Though the Court of Appeals has generally approved the use of this jury instruction, this Court has never considered it. Finding a portion of the hindsight instruction to be i
OPINION ROSS, Judge. The Minneapolis Police Department transferred 54-year-old, 24-year veteran police officer Scott Peterson from the department’s violent offender task force to the department’s licensing unit. Peterson filed an age-discrimination complaint with the Minneapolis Department of Human Resources, and a year later the city determined that the
in Re: Traci R. Jones and Sharon M. Cottonpublic domain
Order entered October 21, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01113-CV IN RE TRACI R. JONES AND SHARON M. COTTON, Relators Original Proceeding from Ellis County, Texas ORDER Before Chief Justice Burns and Justices Partida-Kipness and Smith Based on the Court’s
Rice v. Smithpublic domain
PER CURIAM: In appeal number 07-7559, Nathaniel Dante Rice appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and its order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. Smith, No. 1:05-cv-00434-WLO-PTS (M.D.
State v. Smithpublic domain
668 S.E.2d 612 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Tracy Glen SMITH. No. COA08-533. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 18, 2008. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney Marc X. Sneed, for the State. Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for defendant-appellant. TYSON, Judge. Tracy Glen Smith ("defendant") appeals from judgment entered aft
Smith v. Davispublic domain
PER CURIAM: Charles Jerall Smith appeals a district court’s final order entering judgment in the Appellee’s favor in accordance with the jury’s resolution of the factual issues. Smith contends that the trial testimony established that the Appellee used excessive force. We have reviewed the record and find no reason to disturb the jury’s verdict. We note that Smith does not challenge the district court’s order dismissing his